Beoardielingen foar NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite troch Giorgio Maone
2.361 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 16195434, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch progan01, 5 jierren lynUp until Firefox 79, NoScript was an indispensable part of my security suite, handling intrusions and trouble scripts very well. But now either Firefox or NoScript does not remember my instructions from one session to the next, forcing me to re-approve privileges each time I revisit a site. I don't know why this is happening, but it's an enormous hindrance and a great timesuck. Can you look into this for me, Giorgio? Your product has been a Godsend to me, and I want to continue using it.
Antwurd ûntwikkeler
5 jierren lyn pleatstIt's most likely this CCleaner bug: https://hackademix.net/2020/08/05/ccleaner-wiping-out-firefox-extensions-data-expected-fix-work-around/ - Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 16184636, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Zitronella, 5 jierren lynNoScript works perfect also on firefox 79.0
If it doesn't remember settings the reason could be CCleaner > Custom Clean > Applications > Firefox > “Internet Cache” option deletes all *.sqlite-shm, *.sqlite-wal,
see
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/07/09/changes-to-storage-sync-in-firefox-79/#comment-226931
That’s a bug in CCleaner, not in NoScript and not in Firefox.Antwurd ûntwikkeler
5 jierren lyn pleatsthttps://hackademix.net/2020/08/05/ccleaner-wiping-out-firefox-extensions-data-expected-fix-work-around/ - Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch nenas1ya, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 16136545, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 16103032, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 15819827, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Jaga, 5 jierren lynWorks perfectly on all websites used. All pages loads slower than usual time.
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch singh, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch smluuvslm, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Pieta, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch gep23, 5 jierren lynOne of my best ratings. Recently, however, the permissions are no longer saved and I have to reassign them almost every session.
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch user 735972, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch theone, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14601750, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Татьяна, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch visika, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 3 fan 5troch Dragganot33, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch MSpan, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch GT, 5 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 3 fan 5troch Andralon, 5 jierren lyna script that is marked "trusted" on one page, is also trusted on every other page, which is the same as "trusted globally".
if "disable restrictions globally (dangerous)" is
"dangerous" (in the programmers opinion), why is the "trusted" not bound to the specific page?
- page A does work without script X
- page B doesn't work without script X
(e.g. doubleclick, googleanalytics, googlestatics)
why would i want to allow script X on page A?