Beoardielingen foar NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite troch Giorgio Maone
Wurdearringen foar Firefox-brûker 12839
Wurdearring: 2 fan 5
troch Firefox-brûker 12839, 8 jierren lynEDIT: OK after some time playing around with the settings I understand it much better and the functionality appears to work well. I suggest people experiment with the settings a bit, or check out the noscript forum where there are some explanations of the UI if you find the relevant threads.
In the meantime, I will keep my 2-star rating until a proper help guide to the UI is incorporated into the addon as a link, and an on-boarding process for new installations includes a pop up alerting users to the guide as this is sorely needed, especially for users of the old add-on. This rating reflects my experience as a new user, not my experience now, as this is more relevant to potential new users reading these reviews.
---
I agree with others that I do not really know how to use this addon any more whereas I had perfect intuition of it pre-57 days. The interface is non-intuitive and is not really explained anywhere. After some time I think I am beginning to understand it but I am still not sure because I cannot reference what I think against official documentation. The latter would help a lot.
I don't blame the addon developer, as he probably had to develop it in his spare time in time for release 57. i acknowledge the effort to upgrade the addon to the new API while many other developers gave up. Thank you, Giorgio for that.
I do blame Mozilla somewhat for switching to a substandard extension API and not having certain vital API features available to developers to test until very late (and some not even yet existing). I realise there were some reasons to make the change, but they should have considered the effect on the existing users and developers and tried to mitigate it somehow.
While I agree that expressing such anger in obscene words is inappropriate, it is appropriate to give an honest review and rating. My rating expresses what I currently think about this addon and is by no means an emotional reaction to change.
I am sure that many improvements will come and user feedback will be acknowledged by the developer. I encourage him to ignore the insults and continue. My review and rating will improve as the addon improves in my estimation.
In the meantime, I will keep my 2-star rating until a proper help guide to the UI is incorporated into the addon as a link, and an on-boarding process for new installations includes a pop up alerting users to the guide as this is sorely needed, especially for users of the old add-on. This rating reflects my experience as a new user, not my experience now, as this is more relevant to potential new users reading these reviews.
---
I agree with others that I do not really know how to use this addon any more whereas I had perfect intuition of it pre-57 days. The interface is non-intuitive and is not really explained anywhere. After some time I think I am beginning to understand it but I am still not sure because I cannot reference what I think against official documentation. The latter would help a lot.
I don't blame the addon developer, as he probably had to develop it in his spare time in time for release 57. i acknowledge the effort to upgrade the addon to the new API while many other developers gave up. Thank you, Giorgio for that.
I do blame Mozilla somewhat for switching to a substandard extension API and not having certain vital API features available to developers to test until very late (and some not even yet existing). I realise there were some reasons to make the change, but they should have considered the effect on the existing users and developers and tried to mitigate it somehow.
While I agree that expressing such anger in obscene words is inappropriate, it is appropriate to give an honest review and rating. My rating expresses what I currently think about this addon and is by no means an emotional reaction to change.
I am sure that many improvements will come and user feedback will be acknowledged by the developer. I encourage him to ignore the insults and continue. My review and rating will improve as the addon improves in my estimation.
2.387 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 3 fan 5troch Air, 8 dagen lynVery useful on a computer, however, enabling it by default on a mobile phone will block many important features, including but not limited to any AI features and video browsing
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19157064, 14 dagen lynCompletely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Cory Sanin, 15 dagen lynOne star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19145735, 16 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch And?, 20 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch A Tea Daze, 21 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch srzlt, 24 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch jordan9543, 24 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch vit55555, 25 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18218075, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch fiendkaka, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Shannon Sobeck, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19088604, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch kk, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19072892, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch cwqing1973, 2 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 14468519, 2 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch rabbitshee, 2 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19047433, 2 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch A. Bilmanda, 2 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Lazer Bear, 2 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Sembler, 2 moannen lyn