Beoardielingen foar NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite troch Giorgio Maone
2.373 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 12634028, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch pelm, 8 jierren lynI must say it's a shame that so many people can think of complaining of a free (gpl) software! Instead they should donate more to the developer, Giorgio Maone, who has dedicated so much of his time to develop a free security suite for Firefox, they should give him both more money and do bugfixing as testing to help him. This version, 10.x, is a complete rewrite of the earlier 5.x. Firefox has completely changed its addon system to a system which isn't allowing as much as before. The current 10.1.2 version is working good, but you can't and shouldn't compare it with 5.x because of the webextension API being so limited. So I hoping Giorgio can working through, and don't look at this site and its shameful complaints. Thank you Giorgio!
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13480663, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 3 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13520787, 8 jierren lynBroken with latest update.
I'm NOT ok with the removal of noscript from the context menu and having to go to the radio icon to make changes each time.
Equally changes do not take effect 100% of the time, or at all. I can approve a site and on reload of the page the settings are back to default. This prevents me from even loading some pages because it simply won't save settings. I've now had to disable the extension to even do things.
I've used this addon for years and can not understand the latest move... even the menu options have been reduced to nothing compared to previous versions. - Wurdearring: 3 fan 5troch ~Ar-S~, 8 jierren lynThanks for your development efforts in FF 57. But the old GUI was much more simple as i am concern.
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13519535, 8 jierren lynThank you for all the work you put into your excellent add on.
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13519282, 8 jierren lynOh gawd halp. Absolutely will not stop tossing the XSS box into my face. I can't disable it. Even if I completely disable the XSS "protection" It still won't stop tossing the box in my face, and if I tell it to "always allow" it still tosses the box up! LE URGHAURRF
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Dan Theman, 8 jierren lynThank you for your continued development efforts. I hope you can return NoScript to it's former glory, despite the massive changes forced upon us all by Mozilla. I do miss the old interface, especially the simple "Temporarily Allow All Scripts" button.
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Jackson Alley, 8 jierren lynAppreciate the work to update this for Quantum. Working well most of the time but seems to have issues with piecemeal enabled scripts for a site with inter-dependencies. ESPN is good example.
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13391222, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 2 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13518868, 8 jierren lynI really liked this extension but the latest update has ruined it. The new UI is very unintuitive and difficult to use. I struggled to get permissions to apply on a website; it kept resetting every time I closed the NoScript settings. Also, I was in those settings because NoScript now has broken most of my RSS feeds on Firefox. I do not know why or how but the only way I seem to get all my RSS feeds working is by disabling NoScript.
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13501209, 8 jierren lynThe update contains the features missing from the initial release. I'm also starting to get used to the new interface. Thanks for this awesome add-on!
- Wurdearring: 3 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 12416561, 8 jierren lynI understand it can be difficult to migrate to a new framework, which is why I am slightly sympathetic. However, the people have spoken. The new UI is garbage, and much of the functionality has been altered in a negative way since the Web Extensions framework updates. I'll go back to 5 stars pending UI and usage fixes! In spite of all this, thank you for the work you've done on the extension.
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Nullifidian, 8 jierren lynI like new interface and access to custom permission for current website with just few clicks.
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 12210558, 8 jierren lynI put 4 stars to encourage the developer, but I don't understand how it works. I can't find the options with the whitelist, the embeddings and the appearance. I don't even understand how to temporary allow some scripts in one click like before. I downgrade in Firefox 56 and I'll wait for a better version.
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13468636, 8 jierren lynIt's not as good as the original YET, but at least he put something out there so we're not browsing totally naked.
Interface not as friendly, block scripts well, but hard to fine tune like before.
A good start.
So thanks Giorgio and please keep working on that better version we all really want. Don't make us wait too long. - Wurdearring: 3 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13516526, 8 jierren lynWhy did you change a simple UI to this "new" style. You already had the issue with late support for the new firefox, and then you came across with this ugly and popups spamming addon ? Umatrix welcome
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13503787, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 3 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13505654, 8 jierren lynThere is a bug related to XSS blocking in recent updates:
Opening new tabs from Firfox's blank page is extremely slow and showing a dialog "XSS attack from [...] to ".
Please fix. - Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 12109970, 8 jierren lyn
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 13515663, 8 jierren lynNice new interface but very confusing. You gonna get a lot of complains about it.
- Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch Prateek Shukla, 8 jierren lynThanks for bringing the temporary allow all & revoke options. Please continue going and make the WE version as good and power as the normal version.
One question - Clicking the default option show that scripts are marked for sites to load, only objects are unmarked. Is this an UI error?