Beoardielingen foar Web Archives
Web Archives troch Armin Sebastian
Wurdearringen foar KirkH420
Wurdearring: 4 fan 5
troch KirkH420, 3 jierren lynIt works to some extent, I like it's ability to open all the different web archives with one click.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
There is a bit of an issue with some archives. For URLs: When I click on an URL to a Microsoft.com out-dated page, the Wayback Machine will take me to Microsoft's Error404 landing page.
This URL for example:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885
When passed to this add-on, the Wayback Machine converts it to this page:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220328035922/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/404Error.aspx
*It's landing on a Wayback Redirect page. After 5 seconds, the page gets redirected to another page.
We can see in the date is /2022-03-28-03:59:22/ and this is one of the newest snapshots created by the Archive. It's unfortunate, but The Wayback Machine continues to create snapshots of these 404 pages.
So someone might say, why don't you just use the Wayback Date-toolbar to turn back to an older date? The problem is, since your tool is finding the newest snapshots, it's returning these 404 pages. This changes the URL that we're searching for.
The API docs for the Wayback Machine says "timestamp is the timestamp to look up in Wayback. If not specified, the most recenty available capture in Wayback is returned."
The correct way to use the API is to create a link like this:
http://archive.org/wayback/available?url=https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45885×tamp=20010101
*This will return a .json that contains a working "closest snapshot" URL and you can click on it.
It appears that this add-on is not using the API but is trying to manipulate URLs instead. This wont work well.
If you add the "×tamp=20010101" key, it will enable the "Return closest snapshot to the date 2001-01-01" rather than return the newest available snapshot. The downside is, you'll need to write something that will handle the .json API return data. (which shouldn't be very hard)
Doing it that way will ALWAYS return a website. Not those Error404 landing pages.
319 beoardielingen
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18960744, 6 oeren lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Deo, 3 dagen lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Kaqxar, 5 dagen lynAlas it breaks login pages which use Cloudflare captcha!
I first thought that uBO and/or Privacy Badger are the culprit and disabled those, but then still could reliably reproduce the bug. Then I disabled *ALL* my extensions and enabled them one by one, meanwhile testing logging in. When I turned on Web Archives, login stopped working, I got an error message after entering my credentials and clicking the "I am a human" checkbox on the popup Cloudflare captcha.
Once I disabled Web Archives, login started to work again.
Mind you, this test was done with uBO and PB still being disabled.Antwurd ûntwikkeler
3 dagen lyn pleatstI don't see how this extension could break your login page, but if you'd open an issue on GitHub, we could debug the problem together by testing the same login page.
https://github.com/dessant/web-archives/issues - Wurdearring: 4 fan 5troch dost, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch frostbyte, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19173586, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19114790, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18905802, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19145735, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19128233, ien moanne lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch casi dancasy, 2 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 19096545, 2 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch wertzuz, 2 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Kay, 2 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Kasander, 4 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch selmasoken, 4 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Happy, 4 moannen lynYou're better off just manually visiting the archive websites. Here's a suggestion, instead of opening a specific snapshot, open the snapshots (or history) page where the user can see (if) different snapshots and play around till they find the one that works. This will reduce the number of times the user gets "No results"
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch BatsRule, 5 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 1 fan 5troch Sione, 5 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Maximilian Grothusmann, 5 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 15254436, 5 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18866863, 5 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch Firefox-brûker 18248595, 5 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch VaRLoK, 5 moannen lyn
- Wurdearring: 5 fan 5troch stop5, 5 moannen lyn