סקירות עבור NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite Giorgio Maone מאת
סקירה מאת משתמש Firefox 13504819
דירוג 3 מתוך 5
מאת משתמש Firefox 13504819, לפני 8 שניםFirst of all thank you for all the effort you put into the new Quantum-enabled version of NoScript. I can imagine, it took a lot of time to rewrite this extension, which had been developed for years, completely from scratch.
It is noticable that the new version has been written in a big hurry. The UI is not fully developed and looks like it was made for newbies than for experienced computer users. I know, the UI cannot be changed back. We all will have to accept that XUL is gone. I don't think, the new UI is bad in general. It is just not finished yet.
Sadly, some very important features are still missing. For me personally, giving temporary permissions to a website is a must-have feature. I think this is such a key component that I wonder why it has not been implemented yet. How am I supposed to test a website? Giving it permanent permissions and later revoking them again is not a very effective way.
There are still a lot of things to be done. However, I think a huge step was made already. The basic functionality is now implemented as a WebExtension with more functionality to follow. Keep up the good work. I am sure, the comments and ratings of NoScript will become better soon.
It is noticable that the new version has been written in a big hurry. The UI is not fully developed and looks like it was made for newbies than for experienced computer users. I know, the UI cannot be changed back. We all will have to accept that XUL is gone. I don't think, the new UI is bad in general. It is just not finished yet.
Sadly, some very important features are still missing. For me personally, giving temporary permissions to a website is a must-have feature. I think this is such a key component that I wonder why it has not been implemented yet. How am I supposed to test a website? Giving it permanent permissions and later revoking them again is not a very effective way.
There are still a lot of things to be done. However, I think a huge step was made already. The basic functionality is now implemented as a WebExtension with more functionality to follow. Keep up the good work. I am sure, the comments and ratings of NoScript will become better soon.
2,369 דירוגים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 19047433, לפני יומיים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת A. Bilmanda, לפני 5 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Lazer Bear, לפני 5 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Sembler, לפני 14 ימים
- דירוג 2 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 15056996, לפני 24 ימיםissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- דירוג 4 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 17847461, לפני חודש
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18989716, לפני חודש
- I really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת LittleFire, לפני חודש
- דירוג 4 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18920843, לפני חודש
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18315395, לפני חודשיים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת VonD68, לפני חודשיים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת luis, לפני חודשיים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Retromania, לפני חודשיים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Luciano Rangel, לפני חודשיים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18924473, לפני חודשיים