סקירות עבור Full Page Screen Capture — FireShot
Full Page Screen Capture — FireShot TruePage מאת
סקירה מאת TELLALL4ALL
דירוג 2 מתוך 5
מאת TELLALL4ALL, לפני 3 שנים8-2-25: no improvement. Can't deal with large pages and gives an error. Cant snapshot parts of pages except under ffox. SLOW there are no really good snapshot addons that I have seen
2-5-25 same. cannot do partial pages unless in FFox. Slow can't handle large pages and freezes your machine w/out warning or requires you to split the page into segments. slow to load slow to perform
8-31-24: Slow as hell. Only works well with firefox. they must be using Commodore servers with wet string tin can connection to the net.
7-29-24: selecting portion to be copied only works on ffox. won't work on brave. better than awesome screen shot for this purpose WIth awsome it's a unreliable two step process to get a portion of the page to save.
1-17-24: Last time I tried Fireshot screen capture, I noticed some definite improvements: a WARNING when capture webpage is too long and splits the image into pieces for faster save and download. Hope this wasn't a temporary fix because it is a big improvement. Also seems to more reliably give u the option of your partial selection of the page instead of automatically trying to save the entire page. Good going.
10-20-23: ico doesn't appear sometimes so you cannot select image you want to capture, u have to take the defaul full page which implements w/out your input. Freezes computer on large pages requiring hard reboot. Slow. Awesome capture is better program.
9-11-23: kinda buggy. Sometimes freezes computer in windows 8.1 as it cannot handle the cpu/memory load on larger captures. This frequently means a hard reboot: NOT GOOD. Flaky method of selecting portions of the page that often does not work To SLOW to go to save image. Cannot set the path and directory to save captures without having to add the FIRESHOT directory and BS to every file. Other than that it's too damn slow.
7-28-23: Puts big white lines interspersed in the capture image. Often slow and flaky especially with tor. Had to install Awesome screen capture which is working much better. This one works about 50% of the time and is slow and not reliable in it's response to user input. It's ok, just needs to be polished more.
so far works pretty well. PDF is slow. Have only used it recently so the warts may show up later. but so far so good.
2-5-25 same. cannot do partial pages unless in FFox. Slow can't handle large pages and freezes your machine w/out warning or requires you to split the page into segments. slow to load slow to perform
8-31-24: Slow as hell. Only works well with firefox. they must be using Commodore servers with wet string tin can connection to the net.
7-29-24: selecting portion to be copied only works on ffox. won't work on brave. better than awesome screen shot for this purpose WIth awsome it's a unreliable two step process to get a portion of the page to save.
1-17-24: Last time I tried Fireshot screen capture, I noticed some definite improvements: a WARNING when capture webpage is too long and splits the image into pieces for faster save and download. Hope this wasn't a temporary fix because it is a big improvement. Also seems to more reliably give u the option of your partial selection of the page instead of automatically trying to save the entire page. Good going.
10-20-23: ico doesn't appear sometimes so you cannot select image you want to capture, u have to take the defaul full page which implements w/out your input. Freezes computer on large pages requiring hard reboot. Slow. Awesome capture is better program.
9-11-23: kinda buggy. Sometimes freezes computer in windows 8.1 as it cannot handle the cpu/memory load on larger captures. This frequently means a hard reboot: NOT GOOD. Flaky method of selecting portions of the page that often does not work To SLOW to go to save image. Cannot set the path and directory to save captures without having to add the FIRESHOT directory and BS to every file. Other than that it's too damn slow.
7-28-23: Puts big white lines interspersed in the capture image. Often slow and flaky especially with tor. Had to install Awesome screen capture which is working much better. This one works about 50% of the time and is slow and not reliable in it's response to user input. It's ok, just needs to be polished more.
so far works pretty well. PDF is slow. Have only used it recently so the warts may show up later. but so far so good.
2,589 דירוגים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת nobody, לפני 7 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת César, לפני 7 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18908709, לפני 9 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת outsida92, לפני 9 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 19635866, לפני 17 ימיםThanks for writing clean, functional software. A life raft in this ocean of mediocre platforms. This is a great tool.
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18599696, לפני 17 ימיםCapture selection allows multi-page capture as PDF or PNG. A wonderful quick way to save webpages.
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת AlfaUSA Developer, לפני 19 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Anonymous Chinchilla, לפני 24 ימים
- דירוג 2 מתוך 5מאת Xan, לפני 24 ימיםObnoxious Advertising Even On Paid "Pro" Version
12-11-25 - I've been using this extension for nearly a year now and overall I'm satisfied with its performance. I have three major problems that prevent me from giving it 5 stars:
1) The dev insists on printing "Captured by Fireshot" and "Get Fireshot" on every single page of your finished PDF! There is no way to disable this obnoxious advertising! It's an insult to customers who paid for the pro version to have that unnecessarily cluttering up their PDFs and wasting ink when you need to print the pages.
2) The finished PDF sizes are ENORMOUS. For example, a recent pdf I saved from Reddit resulted in a 3 page file that is 2.9MB! This is insane considering that I saved the exact same pdf using Vivaldi's FREE built-in "print to pdf" feature and that pdf is 5 pages and just 366kb! One of my largest Fireshot pdf files is a 205 page Reddit post that resulted in a 219.5MB file! My average Fireshot file size is about 50MB and I save up to one hundred per day, so this is a big problem for someone like me.
To be fair, Fireshot's resulting PDF looks more accurate compared to what you're seeing on the screen (Vivaldi's shrinks the first Reddit post to half of its actual width for some reason, which adds more pages to the finished file), but that accuracy doesn't matter when you're saving thousands of pdfs per week because Fireshot's huge pdf file sizes really add up! Now I have to add the cumbersome step of compressing dozens of pdfs per day with an external app to my workflow. Extremely annoying!
3) Fireshot has an obnoxious nag screen that auto opens after you've saved a certain number of pdfs. The only purpose of that nag screen is to pester you into leaving a review! It's unacceptable to nag your paid "Pro" customers to leave a review on top of your already obnoxious branding on every saved pdf page!
For a free way to save to pdf, you'll have to switch to another browser if you're on a Mac (you can save to pdf on Firefox for free too, but the finished pdfs are untitled). I recommend Vivaldi if you must used a Chrome-based browser for this; just remember to tweak your privacy settings and use the UBlock Origin extension and other privacy-protecting addons.
After one solid year of using Fireshot to print to pdf, I've decided to switch to Vivaldi as my daily driver simply because these 3 major Fireshot issues have made saving to pdf on Firefox too cumbersome and annoying. - דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 19616311, לפני חודש
- דירוג 4 מתוך 5מאת eeptyoopty, לפני חודשSave to PDF option downloads a .exe file, which seems sketchy. otherwise, high praise!
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 15491091, לפני חודשיים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 17447711, לפני חודשייםIt works great. The only annoyance is that it updates very frequently, and every time it does, it pops up a new announcement about the next time you go to use the app. But that's a very minor thing.
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Tiff, לפני חודשיים