I love Proton Mail but Proton Pass is absolutely useless for me as I must be logged in to my Proton Mail to use it.

Doesn't have autofill which makes is dealbreaker considering it's one of the core features that every other password manager already has.

To make it worse, they use the term "autofill" to describe their difinitively MANUAL method of entering credentials. It's misleading, and confusing. I even wasted two days communicating with their customer support in a frustrating back-and-forth because they don't understand what "autofill" means.

Upon reevaluating the Firefox Extension, Proton Pass, it's clear that it holds true to its commitment of being an entirely private and secure password manager—it efficiently safeguards all your data, metadata included. However, the user interface could see enhancements, particularly in terms of detail management. As it stands at the time of this review, only a limited portion of the screen is available for editing all your details.

A key gripe for me is the inability to adjust your login email address—a restriction that Proton itself doesn't see as crucial, suggesting users subscribe to a new package with a different address if desired. This is puzzling, especially since I've managed to alter my email address on other secure platforms like sync.com, which also incorporate end-to-end encryption. Such experiences affirm that this feature, indeed, can be integrated, even within E2E encryption models' framework.

Despite these early developmental challenges and teething issues—commonplace for any new product—Proton Pass, barring the aforementioned points, proves itself to be an impressive offering.

Was really looking forward to using this as my first password manager. However, when going through websites and updating old vulnerable passwords, Proton Pass did not save or offer to save the newly updated password. So after using the "suggest strong password" from Proton Pass, it never saves it! What's the point then?
Firefox asked immediately to save these after updating but Proton did not, making it the inferior product at the time of this review. Extremely disappointed and irritated. And yes "Prompt for auto-save" is turned on in the settings.

UPDATED ON AUGUST 8: If I spoof my user agent string to identify my web browser as Firefox 110 or any older version, then this add-on interferes with mas.to by blocking the search box and its quick access menu. I have already reported this bug via Proton Customer Support (request #2325002). I'm uninstalling this add-on.

I'm sure that this Password Manager app will be as awesome as Protons other products such as their email and VPN, if I ever get to understand how to use it?
:Note to PROTON: Please, learn how to simplify your approach to doing installs. I have had much difficulty with the VPN and it took me forever to adsorb most of what I need from your great Email app, but this Password Manager? Not so much!

Can't login with containers. You have in your other extensions the possibility to link with a token, why not here?

I have a paid proton account, and I click the upgrade button because now they want you to pay more for this feature, but it doesn't tell you what you have to pay or change when you click upgrade... I don't understand what I need to do in order to make this app work beyond the initial 7 day trail period??

Same issue as stated by other user
"Unable to sign in to Proton Pass. Unprocessable Content" I'm sure whn this will be sorted, i will love it...

I am logged into Protonmail, but get this message when I try to use the extension:

Unable to sign in to Proton Pass. Unprocessable Entity

Not clear why is doesnt work on 102.12esr (debian)
What is the minimal required version exactly and what is wrong with latest ESR?

This add-on is totally not web development friendly. If for some reason you choose not to offer user+password remembering functionalities on localhost / non encrypted connections, you should be decent enough to fallback your user to default Firefox functionalities.

Addon not working in the Mullvad browser. (file appears to be corrupt error) I know, the service is on beta and this is a browser that uses firefox "framework" and is not necessarily Firefox. However I'd like the service to at least be accessible from web address (to consider adopting the service). I am not installing Firefox instead, as it would kill the entire purpose of a privacy-focused environment.