סקירות עבור Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike Dmitry Selivanov מאת
סקירה מאת משתמש Firefox 17708027
דירוג 2 מתוך 5
מאת משתמש Firefox 17708027, לפני 8 ימיםПолезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
4,737 דירוגים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Jacob, לפני 15 שעות
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת aUser, לפני 5 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת petethecanuck, לפני 5 ימיםgreat add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Sweet Citrus, לפני 5 ימים[Editing my review]
The problem I mentioned prior is gone now. I can now rate this 5/5!! - דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Zelgadis-San, לפני 10 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Juraj Mäsiar, לפני 14 ימיםThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- דירוג 3 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 13519206, לפני 16 ימים
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18900251, לפני 16 ימיםThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.תגובת המפתח
מועד פרסום: לפני 15 ימיםI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Riku70X, לפני 19 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת malisipi, לפני 19 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת placidtea, לפני 20 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Spigot, לפני 21 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Dale Cooper, לפני 22 ימים
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18909402, לפני 22 ימים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Kiwi18, לפני 23 ימים
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 15889624, לפני 23 ימים
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת Cameron Owens, לפני 24 ימיםI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
תגובת המפתח
מועד פרסום: לפני 23 ימיםGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת Nicky McCurdy, לפני חודשThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18144459, לפני חודש
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 19547104, לפני חודש
תגובת המפתח
מועד פרסום: לפני חודשMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much.תגובת המפתח
מועד פרסום: לפני חודשMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much.- The iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.