סקירות עבור Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context Wikiwand מאת
668 דירוגים
- דירוג 2 מתוך 5מאת Schorle, לפני 8 חודשים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 16073868, לפני 8 חודשים
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18749240, לפני 8 חודשיםWikiwand used to be great. It was a bit annoying when the AI features were shoved in my face, but it was at least tolerable. However, ads have been added recently, and even if I use an ad blocker there are still placeholders breaking the page layout.
RIP Wikiwand. - דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת Mikaïl, לפני 8 חודשיםThe AI features are useless, used it once and didn't even answer my question, might as well use ChatGPT for AI
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת OzMerry, לפני 8 חודשיםSo, I wrote a negative review yesterday (which I've now deleted), but it appears that the Wikiwand add-on was updated yesterday and it's now working again. Yay! The AI Tools block on the right can be minimised and an ad blocker takes care of ads, but I may just upgrade to a paid version anyway since I use Wikipedia a lot and WIkiwand (pro) is very reasonably priced and supports the existing and ongoing development efforts of a great add-on. FWIW, I think it's worth it to get a much better reading experience than ordinary Wikipedia for frequent users.
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת Richard Yan, לפני 8 חודשיםUsed to be great with beautiful styles. When the AI stuff rolled out, I felt like it was bad taste but stuck with it. Then came the ads, on top of hard work by volunteers editing wikipedia. I guess we do live in a capitalist society with insatiable corporate greed, but the least I could do is to stop using this expired plugin. Oh and also, no, some lines of CSS is not worth $5 a month.
- דירוג 2 מתוך 5מאת Tamm Horsfall, לפני 8 חודשיםPutting ads and AI-slop on a free to use webpage is peak greed, well done. You are a shadow of your former self.
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת linuxenjoyer, לפני 8 חודשיםIt was good for a while but they added AI stuff nobody asked for and you now have to be logged into their system for data collection if you don't want to get served ads.
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת Nick, לפני 8 חודשיםI'll stick with Wiki's default look if it means no ads, no random AI stuff, etc. Have been a user for some time, but I guess all good things must come to an end.
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18744013, לפני 8 חודשיםI've used this extension for quite some time and it used to work flawlessly. As of recent updates Wikiwand started to inject advertisements into Wikipedia pages even though Wikipedia, by principles, is free from ads. It's absolutely unacceptable.
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת AP6YC, לפני 8 חודשיםWikiwand is absolute trash now. Nonsense AI tools are pushed nonstop, and ads are inserted in so many places in the page. What a waste of what was once a great tool. Go somewhere else to format Wiki pages.
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18743018, לפני 8 חודשיםStarted as a fantastic skin/custom CSS for wikipedia. Now turned into some sort of weird corporate product pushing AI summaries and an ungodly amount of ads! Ads on wikipedia??? Have you gone insane?
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18229951, לפני 8 חודשים
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 18725086, לפני 8 חודשים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת rey, לפני 8 חודשים
- דירוג 4 מתוך 5מאת Xen, לפני 9 חודשים
- דירוג 1 מתוך 5מאת Joey, לפני 9 חודשיםDoes not enhance the user experience of Wikipedia at all. Instead, it changes the look slightly and then bombards you with pop-ups trying to get you to buy their AI service whenever you try to read an article.
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 14528042, לפני 9 חודשים
- דירוג 5 מתוך 5מאת Seän "Frostbyte" Shepherd, לפני 9 חודשים
- דירוג 2 מתוך 5מאת משתמש Firefox 13917435, לפני 9 חודשיםIt used to be very good. I am sorry to say but the actual Wikipedia website offers a cleaner, and better experience than this riddled with unnecessary feature(s) add-on.