Recenzije za Image Max URL
Image Max URL Autor: qsniyg
Recenzija od ForeFix
Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5
od ForeFix, prije 6 godinaVery good addon, to find and grab otherwise inaccessible HD versions of many images. In active development, and on the way to be a better alternative to Imagus and all other image-preview-on-hover extension (it can do basically the same things + upgrade to the HD/source version in the process, which is a BIG advantage).
Actually, it can already be qualified as such, it's just that I'm hindered a bit by how to popup-on-hover doesn't disappear when we leave the thumbnail beneath: we have to completely leave the HD-image preview itself, which is pretty big and thus often make our cursor go away from the field where thumbnails-to-enlarge are. It's just a problem of convenience because i'm used to how Imagus operates, nothing that can be qualified as a major problem. Currently, i'm just using "Popup position> Beside Cursor" as a semi-workaround.
The Options page could be visually improved imo; too much wasted space... It could use foldable categories, and frames to better separate them. And respecting the "dark themes" of firefox too would be awesome, or at least having a background less bright/blinding than pure white.
Edit: oh, also an entry in the context menu for blacklisting an image (being able to edit the url in the process to make glob rules would be a plus), rather than going to the options and scrolling.
These are just suggestions, your extension is awesome qsniyg! Thank you for making it, improving it so much over time, and for making it open source. You rock!
PS: when you have time, could you improve instagram support for posts that have more than 1 image/media in it? Currently, the "gallery" feature jumps to the next post when we click on an arrow, instead of going through all the images inside the post itself (when it has more than 1).
Actually, it can already be qualified as such, it's just that I'm hindered a bit by how to popup-on-hover doesn't disappear when we leave the thumbnail beneath: we have to completely leave the HD-image preview itself, which is pretty big and thus often make our cursor go away from the field where thumbnails-to-enlarge are. It's just a problem of convenience because i'm used to how Imagus operates, nothing that can be qualified as a major problem. Currently, i'm just using "Popup position> Beside Cursor" as a semi-workaround.
The Options page could be visually improved imo; too much wasted space... It could use foldable categories, and frames to better separate them. And respecting the "dark themes" of firefox too would be awesome, or at least having a background less bright/blinding than pure white.
Edit: oh, also an entry in the context menu for blacklisting an image (being able to edit the url in the process to make glob rules would be a plus), rather than going to the options and scrolling.
These are just suggestions, your extension is awesome qsniyg! Thank you for making it, improving it so much over time, and for making it open source. You rock!
PS: when you have time, could you improve instagram support for posts that have more than 1 image/media in it? Currently, the "gallery" feature jumps to the next post when we click on an arrow, instead of going through all the images inside the post itself (when it has more than 1).
Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije 6 godina(Sorry for the late reply, for some reason I hadn't been notified)
>it's just that I'm hindered a bit by how to popup-on-hover doesn't disappear when we leave the thumbnail beneath
If you set "Popup position" -> "Beside Cursor" (as you wrote), and "Close when leaving thumbnail" (which should be the default), it should work, at least it does for me on Reddit... would you mind opening a github issue (link is on the addon page) for which site you're using that doesn't work (and maybe your settings as well, if you click "Export" at the top)? I'd like to fix this if possible :)
EDIT: I think I understand what you meant now. Previously, the behavior was to close the popup if the cursor was out of both the popup, and the thumbnail. In 0.12.5, you can now customize this to be only the thumbnail if you prefer (through "Close when leaving" -> Thumbnail)
>The Options page could be visually improved imo
I completely agree, this is one of my next priorities. Even I get lost in them, so that's definitely not a good sign haha. Thanks for the suggestions on how to do it, I'll keep them in mind! (tracked here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/91)
EDIT: As of 0.12.16, I've implemented the frames feature you mentioned, and it also supports splitting categories into tabs. Thanks for the idea!
>And respecting the "dark themes" of firefox too would be awesome
Good idea! I've tracked it here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/189.
EDIT: It's in 0.12.3 now, if you set "Dark mode" manually in preferences. Currently for whatever reason, detecting dark mode doesn't work on my system so I can't yet add support for automatic detection.
>oh, also an entry in the context menu for blacklisting an image
I've tracked it here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/127, it might take a bit longer to implement though, as a new UI would have to be made for it. But I agree, it's quite important.
>could you improve instagram support for posts that have more than 1 image/media in it
Yes, that's also something I've been thinking of working on soon. I'll try to do it in the next release if possible :) (tracked here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/50).
EDIT: It's in 0.12.3, if you enable "Use albums for Instagram post thumbnails".
>Thank you for making it, improving it so much over time, and for making it open source
You're very welcome, and thanks for taking the time to write that! :)
>it's just that I'm hindered a bit by how to popup-on-hover doesn't disappear when we leave the thumbnail beneath
If you set "Popup position" -> "Beside Cursor" (as you wrote), and "Close when leaving thumbnail" (which should be the default), it should work, at least it does for me on Reddit... would you mind opening a github issue (link is on the addon page) for which site you're using that doesn't work (and maybe your settings as well, if you click "Export" at the top)? I'd like to fix this if possible :)
EDIT: I think I understand what you meant now. Previously, the behavior was to close the popup if the cursor was out of both the popup, and the thumbnail. In 0.12.5, you can now customize this to be only the thumbnail if you prefer (through "Close when leaving" -> Thumbnail)
>The Options page could be visually improved imo
I completely agree, this is one of my next priorities. Even I get lost in them, so that's definitely not a good sign haha. Thanks for the suggestions on how to do it, I'll keep them in mind! (tracked here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/91)
EDIT: As of 0.12.16, I've implemented the frames feature you mentioned, and it also supports splitting categories into tabs. Thanks for the idea!
>And respecting the "dark themes" of firefox too would be awesome
Good idea! I've tracked it here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/189.
EDIT: It's in 0.12.3 now, if you set "Dark mode" manually in preferences. Currently for whatever reason, detecting dark mode doesn't work on my system so I can't yet add support for automatic detection.
>oh, also an entry in the context menu for blacklisting an image
I've tracked it here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/127, it might take a bit longer to implement though, as a new UI would have to be made for it. But I agree, it's quite important.
>could you improve instagram support for posts that have more than 1 image/media in it
Yes, that's also something I've been thinking of working on soon. I'll try to do it in the next release if possible :) (tracked here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/50).
EDIT: It's in 0.12.3, if you enable "Use albums for Instagram post thumbnails".
>Thank you for making it, improving it so much over time, and for making it open source
You're very welcome, and thanks for taking the time to write that! :)
120 recenzija
- had for 1 year or more i think. i love this extension, it's the only of it's kind that finds the maximum resolution of an online image. even for websites that make it hard to get the highest resolution image this app never disappoints me. i used to use it on Chrome but they banned it so now i just use it on FireFox and Microsoft Edge. hope they never get rid of it.
Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije danGlad to hear it's useful for you!
Regarding Chrome, I haven't updated the (sideloaded) extension to Manifest V3 yet, which is why it can't be installed under newer versions of Chrome. I'm not sure if it's possible or not without reducing its featureset, but it's something I'll look into in the future.
In the meantime, if you do still want to use it with Chrome browsers, you can still use it as a userscript (using something like Tampermonkey or ScriptCat), which has most of the functionality of the addon. - Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od safeAnonym, prije 4 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od max, prije 13 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 4 od 5od HellPhantom, prije 17 danaMy Goal is to get larger and better images of what I already have/see.
Now that Google reverse image lookup is no more this add-on is the best. I use it first to find larger/Better image. Even when it fails I can then use "Search by image" add-on, on what it did find to either search Google lens or TinyEye and about 10 other reverse lookup engines. Its not as convenient as google reverse lookup add-on I had but I believe I might actually be getting to what I want faster now. Not in steps but in results found. 60+% of time I find it in first step not needing "Search by image" add-on. - Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 14571061, prije 18 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 4 od 5od Guimauve, prije mjesecHello, I just discovered this extension and I find it much better than Imagus. Thank you to the developer! However, I have a problem with Google Images: IMU 2025.12.0 works fine with the first 100 thumbnails on the page, but beyond that, IMU no longer displays the image in full size, but only the thumbnails.
Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije 22 danaGoogle Images recently updated, and the previous technique to find the original images past 100 (the preloaded amount) doesn't work anymore. I've implemented a fix for the userscript version, but unfortunately getting this to work on the extension version is a bit trickier, and might not land in the next release (it needs to intercept HTTP calls, which is definitely my least favorite approach towards supporting a website).
I've tracked the feature here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/1533 . Note that once it's implemented, you will need to enable "Rules intercepting HTTP requests" (under the Rules tab). It's disabled by default because it carries a fingerprinting risk. - Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od https://www.youtube.com/@digitalartist2D, prije mjesec
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od malau, prije mjesecIt doesn't really work at all. I'm not sure what it does ? Maybe it is an info stealer ? Or malware ?
Using Reverse Image search ion YANDEX is infinitely better,Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije mjesecSorry, this is a bit of a long response, but I'd like to address to your concerns.
To address the info stealing/malware concern, the script is 100% open source ( https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl ), and does *not* collect any kind of data about you. As part of being in the "Recommended extensions" program, Mozilla thoroughly audits these addons, and has actually requested a few changes in the past (that were implemented) in order for the script to be even more transparent to its users.
Regarding how it works, this addon finds larger images present *within* a website. Many websites will store an original full-sized image, but instead link to a smaller/scaled down version of the image. This is what the (currently) ~5800 rules do, as each website will often have their own systems to resize images.
It doesn't replace using a reverse image search, but rather complements using one. I personally regularly use both a reverse image search engine (such as Yandex, as you mentioned) alongside this addon, and have found that reverse image search engines often link to scaled down images that this addon finds a larger version of present on the website.
I would recommend enabling the "Enable redirection" (under the Redirection tab) and the "Rules using API calls" (under the Rules) tab. These options are disabled by default for users' privacy as they must perform HTTP requests to find the larger image, but they will help by (respectively): #1 Automatically redirecting images opened in their own tabs to the larger versions stored on the same site (if applicable), and #2 Supporting ~20% more websites, which require website-specific API calls to find the larger version (e.g. Flickr).
If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out using any of the communication methods at the bottom of the addon's description (discord/email/github etc.) :) - Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Siegfried Witting, prije mjesecGreat stuff, Found this thing using Grok of all things lol as was looking for a way to download images off Deviant art in higher quality and it delivers!
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Kiwi18, prije 2 mjeseca
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 18285487, prije 3 mjeseca
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Xen, prije 4 mjesecaUseful to extract large version of images from some inconvenient sites
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od WOANS, prije 5 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 4 od 5od youussef, prije 6 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od space, prije 7 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 18719010, prije 8 mjeseciExtremely useful for downloading full sized images from albums. For example, an entire image album can be downloaded from Patreon at once without accidentally downloading anything else.
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Sawyer, prije 10 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od RobertHeadley, prije godinu
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od hkpd, prije godinu
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 18777894, prije godinu
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 17219221, prije godinu
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 16870710, prije godinu
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od rtran015, prije godinu
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 16927628, prije godinu