Recenzije za Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context od Wikiwand
674 recenzije
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Toccetness, prije 7 mjeseciAd-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 17669402, prije 7 mjeseciAs many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od marii, prije 7 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 4 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 17852983, prije 7 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 4 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 16307622, prije 7 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Ok Google, prije 8 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 12391569, prije 8 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Wolphie, prije 8 mjeseciUsed to be a great extension/addon. Ruined by AI slop that apparently needs to appear everywhere now. Plus constant popups everywhere if cookies are cleared. Sad to see such a beautiful piece of work fall so low.
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od winphreak, prije 8 mjeseciI can't wait until the AI screws up all the detailed trivia bits or simple math for a article summary.
Also if Wikiepedia is too hard to read for you, you should probably finish middle school.
This world is gonna get so dumb so fast I can't wait. - Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 12661639, prije 9 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 2 od 5od ShodanV3, prije 9 mjeseciThey ruined the BEST wikipedia addon with AI. It's bloat now. If I wanted that, I'd just ask AI for info instead of using wikipedia. Please do a lite version without it or something.
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 17046154, prije 9 mjeseciUsed to be a solid add-on, but now pesters the user to login for "AI tools" every time a Wikipedia link is visited, causing unnecessary bloat and wasting the user's time. Why they absolutely ruined a good add-on is beyond me.
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Lobélia H., prije 10 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od StephenM, prije 10 mjeseciIf I want AI, I'll either build my own local solution with whatever LLM I want for free or go to a website or use a separate app. Wikiwands' entire existence for being is to make the Wikipedia layout easier to read. Nothing else. Don't remake it ever. AI Wand, NOT Wikiwand. Utter JUNK made by JUNK developers, supported by JUNK people.
- Ocijenjeno s 4 od 5od eric guerber, prije 10 mjeseci
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Celena, prije 10 mjeseciThis used to be a good extension, which I used for many years across different browsers and devices. Today I've had enough and I'm going to uninstall it.
Before they started remaking it, it was very good. It was essentially a better layout for Wikipedia with not much else to it, but that's why I liked it. It made it clearer to read, easier to use, and just overall felt like a more updated version of Wikipedia's UI. Combined with an ad blocker, it was perfect. However, since the remake, it is worthless. It is so bloated. The majority of the page is taken up with AI stuff, and it wants you to use it constantly. It has made the layout even more confusing - while before I felt like it was very intuitive and more Wikipedia like, now it's just added so much more junk and confusing elements. Wikipedia is way easier to use.
With this latest update, I'm done. I was already getting frustrated with the way pictures were handled. If you clicked on it, there would be various bits of information that covered over part of the picture. Then there was so much blackspace that it wasn't always that much more visible than in the article. You zoom in and it's barely better. Now, I tried to look at the picture it used for the cover image, which no longer shows up in the sidebar as well. I clicked on it, and it was much the same as it used to be, although the information/other pictures below now fades away. Good! However I tried zooming in, because it was still not a big picture. It not only barely zoomed in, but moved the maybe two pixels bigger image around with my cursor. So now I had a very vaguely enlarged picture of some people that bounced around as I tried to exit out of it. Cool!!!!!! Good thing I never use Wikipedia to look at things like art as someone who enjoys art history!!!
The AI is too much, the paywall is too much, the needing to have a separate account for it is too much. And now they have continued to just make the UI worse and worse. I'm done here. I'm so sad that this has gone this way. I'm so disappointed. They had something good and it's useless now. I'd rather use normal Wikipedia, and that's the first time I've said that in many years. - Ocijenjeno s 2 od 5od Niklas H, prije 10 mjeseciUsed to be slim, nice and handy, but feels a bit bloated since the remake. The possible settings for UI adjustments are great, however the popup is very annoying to always come back since I constantly use private windows, and Wikiwand won't save any settings, instead asks again every time.
AI features are really unneccessary for me. Just please make it save my settings and not ask again for a login everytime. - Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Meta Williams, prije 10 mjeseciI've been here 3 min and I've already learned something!
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 17490856, prije godinu
- Ocijenjeno s 2 od 5od Eonir, prije godinuWhen I open a wikipedia article, 70% of the screen is covered by either AI bullshit, or a huge window with new settings, 90% of which are behind a paywall.
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 17143382, prije godinu
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od DS, prije godinuLove how Wikiwand used to be an incredibly useful product that made Wikipedia more readable and now it's... "AI-driven" slop garbage that no one wants or asked for. Yet another product "improving" itself right out of usefulness. What a waste.
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 17984040, prije godinuShoves GenAI garbage down your throat and the pop ups blocks half the screen. Also sells your data. Just go use something like Modern for Wikipedia
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 14774990, prije godinuGreat design, but ruined by first having AI shoved in my face and now ads everywhere. Back to classic Wikipedia.