Pohódnoćenja za FoxFilter
FoxFilter wot Inspired Effect
Pohódnoćenje wot akasico1
Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot akasico1, 6 måneder siden80 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Psychpsyo, 4 dager sidenHello, I'm currently testing parental control systems to see which adult content tagging systems they respect. Even with "Examine Meta Content" turned on in the sensitivity settings, this extension fails to block websites based on various meta tags used by adult websites to identify themselves as such.
I've tested the following meta tags in use by adult websites and none of them cause the page to be blocked:
<meta name="rating" content="adult" />
<meta name="rating" content="mature" />
<meta name="RATING" content="RTA-5042-1996-1400-1577-RTA" />
<meta name="rating" content="RTA-5042-1996-1400-1577-RTA" />
This let me access at least two websites and various twitter accounts with explicit pornographic content which would otherwise have been blocked.
Also, all adult sites I've checked so far include at least one of these tags. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Kuriakose, 14 dager siden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot HDDHSER, én måned siden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Matija, 2 måneder siden
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18974369, 4 måneder siden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18940725, 4 måneder siden
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Сырное, 5 måneder siden
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Al, 6 måneder sidenDon't waste your time, the password protection feature is behind a paywall.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18639388, 10 måneder siden
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Radu, ett år siden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Tushar Sharma, ett år siden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18512180, ett år siden
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18410251, ett år sidenA bloquer l'accès à des sites pour faire les devoirs de mes enfants. Demande de payer pour débloquer le site. Extension à fuir.
- Z 3 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Yoann Moreau, ett år sidenNot so smart.
- When opening links in a tab, the filter will block the current page instead of the new tab.
- Filtering is quite basic and will have many false positive and false negative.
- Access to extension settings is protected with a ugly workaround, not convenient at all, and not secured anyway. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot davegod75, 2 år sidenHas been working well for me. You do have to pay for it, but it is well worth it. It is quite simple to use and exactly what I was looking for for the kids computers. Simple to install and manage from one place.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 16976370, 2 år siden
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot McZ, 2 år sidenPassword protects only the browser settings. It can easily be deactivated or removed from the puzzle icon - even with a password in place
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Zorele, 2 år siden
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Rakib, 3 år siden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 17517208, 3 år siden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 17490130, 3 år siden
- Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćenywot jokenngo, 3 år siden
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Mephistopheles, 3 år sidenWorks, but uses the shady practice of not being able to set a password unless you pay them, so even if it's there, anybody can just turn it off anyway
Edit: Even if you pay them, trying to install the android version says not intended for android,wtf??Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so 3 år siden napisałHi, we offer all of the filtering options free of charge as a way to try out FoxFilter. In order help cover our expenses, we do charge a very minimal annual fee of $12.99, which we feel is very affordable. We are equally frustrated about Google Android only selectively supporting approximately 200 Chrome extensions for some reason, even though all Chrome extensions were installable on Android at one point. Feel free to reach out to us at foxfilter@inspiredeffect.com to discuss this more. Best regards, FoxFilter Team