Pohódnoćenja za SingleFile
SingleFile wot gildas
998 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot NocedaCloud, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Marce, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wo, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot fuzzydorito, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot JavirtanLabs, kuusi vuotta sittenI used to love the MAFF file format old add-on. I've been missing it till now. Your add-on works pretty well for me. The extra feature for editing (like highlighting) is way too cool. Thanks a lot!
My only question is, how much is this one better than SingleFileZ? I'm curious about that, I mean, why should I use SingleFile instead of SingleFileZ?
EDIT March/11/2020:
The Developer response to my question was pretty clear. Now I understand the differences very well. Thanks a lot for your answer and awesome work!Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so kuusi vuotta sitten napisałThank you for the review. I would say that the main advantage of SingleFile over SingleFileZ is that pages saved with SingleFile do not require JavaScript to be enabled in order to be displayed. In other words, if you want to save your pages as "pure" HTML files, use SingleFile. If you prefer to save them as zip files disguised as HTML pages, use SingleFileZ.
Note that SingleFile allows you to edit the page with the editor you refer to (I'm glad you like it). SingleFileZ cannot do this because it is more complicated to implement.
EDIT: Thank you! - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 13870051, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 3 z 5 pohódnoćenywot triantafillia, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot 茶几上的猫, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Cherwally, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Arioh, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14738141, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Idan Nabara, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot i18n, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Marieli, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Abe, kuusi vuotta sittenMake sure to enable this for JavaScript (https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq.md#why-dont-interactive-elements-like-folding-titles-dynamic-maps-or-carousels-work-properly-in-saved-pages).
Works great! However, I really feel like saving scripts, audio elements, etc. should be enabled by default.Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so kuusi vuotta sitten napisałThank you for the review. The default settings are optimized to produce light (and faithful) snapshot of pages because this was the most recurrent complain in the past. That's why the options you mentioned are disabled. Note also that disabling the option "remove scripts" can, unfortunately, lead to corrupted pages. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 15695469, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot chris-vecchio, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Shivam Patel, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 15160037, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot hannoschwar, kuusi vuotta sitten
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Michael, kuusi vuotta sitten