Pohódnoćenja za Image Max URL
Image Max URL wot qsniyg
Pohódnoćenje wot CODE
Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot CODE, pred 5 rokmihow to create manual rule ?
I want to create rule like this :
/123-small.jpg
/128-small.jpg
/225-small.jpg
to
/123-original.jpg
/128-original.jpg
/225-original.jpg
I want to create rule like this :
/123-small.jpg
/128-small.jpg
/225-small.jpg
to
/123-original.jpg
/128-original.jpg
/225-original.jpg
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so pred 5 rokmi napisałSorry, there's currently no way to add manual rules. This is something I'd really like to add in the future (see https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/41), but currently there are a few technical problems with implementing this for the moment (see the linked issue for a bit more detail on why).
If you want to request a new site to be added to the script, feel free to use any of the contact links listed at the bottom of the script's description, whichever you're most comfortable with. I'm more than happy to add any new website to the script, and if I'm online, I usually add them within minutes of being notified :)
If you'd rather add it to the script yourself (note that this will require sideloading the addon), I've written a bit of a guide here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#websiterule-contributions. In your case, a rule like this should work: if (domain === "subdomain.your-website.com") return src.replace(/(\/[0-9]+-)small(\.[^/.]+)(?:[?#].*)?$/, "$1original$2");
By the way, while the github issue hasn't seen much activity for a while, this does not mean it's been forgotten or ignored, the script is already getting restructured in many areas, which will facilitate the implementation of this. It's just that it is pretty a massive project (currently requires rewriting >70,000 lines of source code - much of which will be automatically handled, but even that requires a very significant amount of work).
If you want to request a new site to be added to the script, feel free to use any of the contact links listed at the bottom of the script's description, whichever you're most comfortable with. I'm more than happy to add any new website to the script, and if I'm online, I usually add them within minutes of being notified :)
If you'd rather add it to the script yourself (note that this will require sideloading the addon), I've written a bit of a guide here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#websiterule-contributions. In your case, a rule like this should work: if (domain === "subdomain.your-website.com") return src.replace(/(\/[0-9]+-)small(\.[^/.]+)(?:[?#].*)?$/, "$1original$2");
By the way, while the github issue hasn't seen much activity for a while, this does not mean it's been forgotten or ignored, the script is already getting restructured in many areas, which will facilitate the implementation of this. It's just that it is pretty a massive project (currently requires rewriting >70,000 lines of source code - much of which will be automatically handled, but even that requires a very significant amount of work).
120 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot girlygirl, pred 3 hodinamihad for 1 year or more i think. i love this extension, it's the only of it's kind that finds the maximum resolution of an online image. even for websites that make it hard to get the highest resolution image this app never disappoints me. i used to use it on Chrome but they banned it so now i just use it on FireFox and Microsoft Edge. hope they never get rid of it.
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so pred 2 hodinami napisałGlad to hear it's useful for you!
Regarding Chrome, I haven't updated the (sideloaded) extension to Manifest V3 yet, which is why it can't be installed under newer versions of Chrome. I'm not sure if it's possible or not without reducing its featureset, but it's something I'll look into in the future.
In the meantime, if you do still want to use it with Chrome browsers, you can still use it as a userscript (using something like Tampermonkey or ScriptCat), which has most of the functionality of the addon. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot safeAnonym, pred 3 dňami
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot max, pred 12 dňami
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot HellPhantom, pred 16 dňamiMy Goal is to get larger and better images of what I already have/see.
Now that Google reverse image lookup is no more this add-on is the best. I use it first to find larger/Better image. Even when it fails I can then use "Search by image" add-on, on what it did find to either search Google lens or TinyEye and about 10 other reverse lookup engines. Its not as convenient as google reverse lookup add-on I had but I believe I might actually be getting to what I want faster now. Not in steps but in results found. 60+% of time I find it in first step not needing "Search by image" add-on. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14571061, pred 17 dňami
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Guimauve, pred mesiacomHello, I just discovered this extension and I find it much better than Imagus. Thank you to the developer! However, I have a problem with Google Images: IMU 2025.12.0 works fine with the first 100 thumbnails on the page, but beyond that, IMU no longer displays the image in full size, but only the thumbnails.
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so pred 21 dňami napisałGoogle Images recently updated, and the previous technique to find the original images past 100 (the preloaded amount) doesn't work anymore. I've implemented a fix for the userscript version, but unfortunately getting this to work on the extension version is a bit trickier, and might not land in the next release (it needs to intercept HTTP calls, which is definitely my least favorite approach towards supporting a website).
I've tracked the feature here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/1533 . Note that once it's implemented, you will need to enable "Rules intercepting HTTP requests" (under the Rules tab). It's disabled by default because it carries a fingerprinting risk. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot https://www.youtube.com/@digitalartist2D, pred mesiacom
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot malau, pred mesiacomIt doesn't really work at all. I'm not sure what it does ? Maybe it is an info stealer ? Or malware ?
Using Reverse Image search ion YANDEX is infinitely better,Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so pred mesiacom napisałSorry, this is a bit of a long response, but I'd like to address to your concerns.
To address the info stealing/malware concern, the script is 100% open source ( https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl ), and does *not* collect any kind of data about you. As part of being in the "Recommended extensions" program, Mozilla thoroughly audits these addons, and has actually requested a few changes in the past (that were implemented) in order for the script to be even more transparent to its users.
Regarding how it works, this addon finds larger images present *within* a website. Many websites will store an original full-sized image, but instead link to a smaller/scaled down version of the image. This is what the (currently) ~5800 rules do, as each website will often have their own systems to resize images.
It doesn't replace using a reverse image search, but rather complements using one. I personally regularly use both a reverse image search engine (such as Yandex, as you mentioned) alongside this addon, and have found that reverse image search engines often link to scaled down images that this addon finds a larger version of present on the website.
I would recommend enabling the "Enable redirection" (under the Redirection tab) and the "Rules using API calls" (under the Rules) tab. These options are disabled by default for users' privacy as they must perform HTTP requests to find the larger image, but they will help by (respectively): #1 Automatically redirecting images opened in their own tabs to the larger versions stored on the same site (if applicable), and #2 Supporting ~20% more websites, which require website-specific API calls to find the larger version (e.g. Flickr).
If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out using any of the communication methods at the bottom of the addon's description (discord/email/github etc.) :) - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Siegfried Witting, pred mesiacomGreat stuff, Found this thing using Grok of all things lol as was looking for a way to download images off Deviant art in higher quality and it delivers!
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Kiwi18, pred 2 mesiacmi
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18285487, pred 3 mesiacmi
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Xen, pred 4 mesiacmiUseful to extract large version of images from some inconvenient sites
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot WOANS, pred 5 mesiacmi
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot youussef, pred 6 mesiacmi
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot space, pred 7 mesiacmi
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18719010, pred 8 mesiacmiExtremely useful for downloading full sized images from albums. For example, an entire image album can be downloaded from Patreon at once without accidentally downloading anything else.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Sawyer, pred 10 mesiacmi
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot RobertHeadley, pred rokom
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot hkpd, pred rokom
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18777894, pred rokom
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 17219221, pred rokom
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 16870710, pred rokom
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot rtran015, pred rokom
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 16927628, pred rokom