Pohódnoćenja za Firefox Multi-Account Containers
Firefox Multi-Account Containers wot Firefox
Pohódnoćenje wot Wužiwar Firefox 17647243
Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot Wužiwar Firefox 17647243, 2 jierren lynI've been testing this extension out for a few weeks and frankly I'm fed up.
The idea is good but it's just not user friendly nor intuitive.
First off it's unclear whether or not every site in the same container can 'talk' to each other. For example: If I open a Shopping container on Amazon, then another Shopping container for Ebay, can the 2 sites share information with each other and profile me?
I tried looking for this question and answer online but came up empty handed. So to be on the safe side one would have to make a separate container for EVERY site they want to keep isolated. That includes separating domains from sub domains.
Second: Sites that I have assigned to containers don't automatically open in said containers. Navigating to the site via the address bar produces a message asking how I want to open the site. Selecting the "Remember my decision for this site" option does nothing, but perhaps that is due to my Firefox settings or other extensions that block cookies and trackers. You would think though that Firefox would make this extension compatible with their built in privacy options.
Third: It takes multiple steps/clicks to remove a site you accidentally add to a container. For me the "Manage Extension" button is cut off (regardless of how zoomed in or not I am) so it took me even longer than others probably to figure it out.
Many people seem to love this extension but frankly there's got to be a better, more hands off approach to stopping sites from tracking and profiling you. If you aren't looking to have every domain and sub domain separate maybe try it, but I will be looking at other options.
The idea is good but it's just not user friendly nor intuitive.
First off it's unclear whether or not every site in the same container can 'talk' to each other. For example: If I open a Shopping container on Amazon, then another Shopping container for Ebay, can the 2 sites share information with each other and profile me?
I tried looking for this question and answer online but came up empty handed. So to be on the safe side one would have to make a separate container for EVERY site they want to keep isolated. That includes separating domains from sub domains.
Second: Sites that I have assigned to containers don't automatically open in said containers. Navigating to the site via the address bar produces a message asking how I want to open the site. Selecting the "Remember my decision for this site" option does nothing, but perhaps that is due to my Firefox settings or other extensions that block cookies and trackers. You would think though that Firefox would make this extension compatible with their built in privacy options.
Third: It takes multiple steps/clicks to remove a site you accidentally add to a container. For me the "Manage Extension" button is cut off (regardless of how zoomed in or not I am) so it took me even longer than others probably to figure it out.
Many people seem to love this extension but frankly there's got to be a better, more hands off approach to stopping sites from tracking and profiling you. If you aren't looking to have every domain and sub domain separate maybe try it, but I will be looking at other options.
7.926 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 15082755, 2 oeren lynThis is one of the core plugins I use (in addition to Ublock Origin).
With the account sync, containers are also remembered across different computers as well, so I don't have to set up the containers on every new laptop or reinstall of firefox. Sometimes I mistakenly open a website in the wrong container because I don't always map every single website to a container, but most of the time it's a non-issue.
I'm surprised this is still an add-on and not a core Firefox feature. - Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18184964, ien dei lynIt doesn't work for me. I cannot create a container where I am logged into Google and simultaneously a container where I'm not logged in.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot luca_gohan, ien dei lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19799825, 2 dagen lynL'add on correspond parfaitement à ce dont j'ai besoin
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14066212, 3 dagen lynA must have, cannot imagine my workflow without it anymore.
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Benjamin MOREAUX, 4 dagen lynVery handy for managing multiple M365 or Google tenants.
For me, the only thing missing is the ability to have “private browsing” containers and a way to always open in a container, for example when editing a bookmark. - Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19794127, 5 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Fosslite, 5 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Arie, 8 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14150725, 8 dagen lyn
- Z 3 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14541632, 9 dagen lynRecently it's been impossible to remove a site from the 'managed site list' - after a short period it re-appears. Perhaps its an integration issue with FF sync, or occurred when FF revamping the profiles management.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19787479, 9 dagen lynExcellent solution to manage multiple cloud tenant.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Jawa D. WAI, 10 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Heruta, 12 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot fsr, 14 dagen lynIt's excellent. Very useful for using the same website with different accounts, like your personal and work accounts.
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot altyspa, 14 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot NeoOne, 15 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot AjarAdore, 18 dagen lynQuite handy once you get the hang of it. I love the ability to purge cookies across a container, very useful. Honestly feel like this should be installed by default and enabled via settings.
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Сырное, 22 dagen lynSo, what do we have here? A mockery from Firefox. Let's go back to the proxy form - it expects "type://host:ip", but what do we actually get? No SOCKS5 support. I enter "SOCKS5://ip:port", and it complains about an unsupported record type. And the proxy has been verified as working. It simply wouldn't work with any functional proxy.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Mike Breytentebach, 23 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot F33db4ck1, 23 dagen lyn
- Z 3 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Queenie, 23 dagen lynl💗ve the concept, the excution is not working so well for me at present - I am not sure where the issue is, whether its in relation to my password keeper or the sites I am accessing (particularly where there is MFA).
Some are just getting caught in a constant login error loop (personally, I think its the sites - Xero, you are the main culprit, and its not unique to this browser or function).
I am new to containers, so still working out how to use them but I desperately want it to work as Chrome profiles have been an ongoing resource vampire. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 15136226, 25 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Tom Fire, ien moanne lyn