Pohódnoćenja za Firefox Multi-Account Containers
Firefox Multi-Account Containers wot Firefox
Pohódnoćenje wot Wužiwar Firefox 18898393
7.929 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19805267, 8 órája
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot MOSIMANEWAPULA WHITE TABANE, 2 napja
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 15082755, 2 napjaThis is one of the core plugins I use (in addition to Ublock Origin).
With the account sync, containers are also remembered across different computers as well, so I don't have to set up the containers on every new laptop or reinstall of firefox. Sometimes I mistakenly open a website in the wrong container because I don't always map every single website to a container, but most of the time it's a non-issue.
I'm surprised this is still an add-on and not a core Firefox feature. - Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18184964, 3 napjaIt doesn't work for me. I cannot create a container where I am logged into Google and simultaneously a container where I'm not logged in.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot luca_gohan, 3 napja
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19799825, 4 napjaL'add on correspond parfaitement à ce dont j'ai besoin
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14066212, 5 napjaA must have, cannot imagine my workflow without it anymore.
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Benjamin MOREAUX, 6 napjaVery handy for managing multiple M365 or Google tenants.
For me, the only thing missing is the ability to have “private browsing” containers and a way to always open in a container, for example when editing a bookmark. - Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19794127, 7 napja
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14150725, 10 napja
- Z 3 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14541632, 10 napjaRecently it's been impossible to remove a site from the 'managed site list' - after a short period it re-appears. Perhaps its an integration issue with FF sync, or occurred when FF revamping the profiles management.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19787479, 11 napjaExcellent solution to manage multiple cloud tenant.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Jawa D. WAI, 12 napja
- So, what do we have here? A mockery from Firefox. Let's go back to the proxy form - it expects "type://host:ip", but what do we actually get? No SOCKS5 support. I enter "SOCKS5://ip:port", and it complains about an unsupported record type. And the proxy has been verified as working. It simply wouldn't work with any functional proxy.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Mike Breytentebach, 25 napja