Pohódnoćenja za Firefox Multi-Account Containers
Firefox Multi-Account Containers wot Firefox
Pohódnoćenje wot Sean Critz
Z 3 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot Sean Critz, 3 månader sidanThis extension needs some work before it fits the concept. In situations where multiple accounts need to be managed on the same website (using multiple microsoft accounts for different clients, for instance) , it is generally not usable. The following workflow breaks it:
- Open tab in X container, login to a service
- Service uses redirects to authenticate, container extension grabs those redirects and loses the container status or changes the container status, breaking the login flow or putting a different login into the context
Additionally, there does not seem to be an option to remove a site from a container preference, once added.
- Open tab in X container, login to a service
- Service uses redirects to authenticate, container extension grabs those redirects and loses the container status or changes the container status, breaking the login flow or putting a different login into the context
Additionally, there does not seem to be an option to remove a site from a container preference, once added.
7.930 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 17586361, ein time sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19805267, 13 timar sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot diegof59, ein dag sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot MOSIMANEWAPULA WHITE TABANE, 2 dagar sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 15082755, 2 dagar sidanThis is one of the core plugins I use (in addition to Ublock Origin).
With the account sync, containers are also remembered across different computers as well, so I don't have to set up the containers on every new laptop or reinstall of firefox. Sometimes I mistakenly open a website in the wrong container because I don't always map every single website to a container, but most of the time it's a non-issue.
I'm surprised this is still an add-on and not a core Firefox feature. - Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18184964, 3 dagar sidanIt doesn't work for me. I cannot create a container where I am logged into Google and simultaneously a container where I'm not logged in.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot luca_gohan, 3 dagar sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19799825, 4 dagar sidanL'add on correspond parfaitement à ce dont j'ai besoin
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14066212, 5 dagar sidanA must have, cannot imagine my workflow without it anymore.
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Benjamin MOREAUX, 6 dagar sidanVery handy for managing multiple M365 or Google tenants.
For me, the only thing missing is the ability to have “private browsing” containers and a way to always open in a container, for example when editing a bookmark. - Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19794127, 7 dagar sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Fosslite, 7 dagar sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Arie, 10 dagar sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14150725, 10 dagar sidan
- Z 3 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14541632, 11 dagar sidanRecently it's been impossible to remove a site from the 'managed site list' - after a short period it re-appears. Perhaps its an integration issue with FF sync, or occurred when FF revamping the profiles management.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19787479, 11 dagar sidanExcellent solution to manage multiple cloud tenant.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Jawa D. WAI, 12 dagar sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Heruta, 14 dagar sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot fsr, 16 dagar sidanIt's excellent. Very useful for using the same website with different accounts, like your personal and work accounts.
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot altyspa, 16 dagar sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot NeoOne, 17 dagar sidan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot AjarAdore, 20 dagar sidanQuite handy once you get the hang of it. I love the ability to purge cookies across a container, very useful. Honestly feel like this should be installed by default and enabled via settings.
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Сырное, 24 dagar sidanSo, what do we have here? A mockery from Firefox. Let's go back to the proxy form - it expects "type://host:ip", but what do we actually get? No SOCKS5 support. I enter "SOCKS5://ip:port", and it complains about an unsupported record type. And the proxy has been verified as working. It simply wouldn't work with any functional proxy.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Mike Breytentebach, 25 dagar sidan