Pohódnoćenja za NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite wot Giorgio Maone
Pohódnoćenje wot robsku
Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot robsku, 5 jierren lynI'm sorry I wrote a bad review. It seems to be deleted, although it was not inappropriate - it was mistaken, and PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS *FEATURE*; whether intentional or not.
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
2.360 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot thofree, 3 dagen lynGets detected by Youtube's anti ad-block stuff. Wish you had a button to turn it off easily for a website without disabling it entirely.
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18920843, 4 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18315395, 15 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot VonD68, 16 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot luis, 18 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Retromania, 23 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Luciano Rangel, 25 dagen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18924473, ien moanne lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18903740, ien moanne lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 15309210, ien moanne lynSimply top. I've been using the extension for years and I'm still delighted with it. I can control exactly which website is allowed to do what.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot FireZilla, ien moanne lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Brutto WP, ien moanne lyn
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Ying Go, ien moanne lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 9771322, 2 moannen lynУ кого отключились дополнения обновите Firefox до 136 версии.
_____________________
For those who have been disabled add-ons, update Firefox to version 136. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot GothGlamPrincess, 2 moannen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot test, 2 moannen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Spamzilla, 2 moannen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot zsyzsykk, 2 moannen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Dulak, 2 moannen lynReally nice, works great, only thing I noticed is that there a weird thing with Alternate Player for Twitch.tv addon.
There seems to be script there that handles the follow button (and clicking that annoying wiggle box at the bottom) and it is getting blocked by noscript, even though it says it's a tab with higher privileges. I have to allow all in tab because the blocked script is not showing up, so i cannot set it to be allowed permanently. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 13759941, 2 moannen lyn
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot catherine martin, 2 moannen lyn