Pohódnoćenja za NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite wot Giorgio Maone
Wotmołwa wot Giorgio Maone
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so 8년 전 napisał"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
2.389 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18710229, 5시간 전This add-on works as intended and has saved me from a lot of potential problems and annoying website antics.
- Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19157064, 19일 전Completely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Cory Sanin, 20일 전One star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19145735, 21일 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot A Tea Daze, 한 달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot jordan9543, 한 달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18218075, 한 달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Shannon Sobeck, 한 달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, 한 달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19088604, 한 달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19072892, 2달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot cwqing1973, 2달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14468519, 2달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot rabbitshee, 2달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19047433, 2달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot A. Bilmanda, 2달 전
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Lazer Bear, 2달 전