Pohódnoćenja za NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite wot Giorgio Maone
Wotmołwa wot Giorgio Maone
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so för 7 år sedan napisał"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
2.364 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 15056996, för 10 dagar sedanissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot 镂心鉥肝, för 15 dagar sedanNoScript还是很好的，不管是界面还是解释如何使用都进行了改进。不过，文章内容应该更加简洁一点。告诉用户每一个功能开关的意思。同时NoScript默认会阻止扩展脚本
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 17847461, för 16 dagar sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18989716, för 18 dagar sedan
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Max, för 19 dagar sedanI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot LittleFire, för 23 dagar sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Absinthe, för 25 dagar sedan
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot thofree, för en månad sedanGets detected by Youtube's anti ad-block stuff. Wish you had a button to turn it off easily for a website without disabling it entirely.
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18920843, för en månad sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18315395, för en månad sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot VonD68, för en månad sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot luis, för en månad sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Retromania, för 2 månader sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Luciano Rangel, för 2 månader sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18924473, för 2 månader sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18903740, för 2 månader sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 15309210, för 2 månader sedanSimply top. I've been using the extension for years and I'm still delighted with it. I can control exactly which website is allowed to do what.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot FireZilla, för 2 månader sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Brutto WP, för 2 månader sedan
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Ying Go, för 2 månader sedan