Pohódnoćenja za Smart Referer
Smart Referer wot meh., ntninja
Pohódnoćenje wot tama
Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot tama, 4 jaar geledenThanks for great addon!
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks.
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks.
75 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Krisna S. Putra, één jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Lucas S., 3 jaar geleden
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14234915, 3 jaar geledenPlease update the whitelist
https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions#-optional - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Bryan Hoang, 3 jaar geleden
- Z 3 z 5 pohódnoćenywot kcufuoyeid, 3 jaar geledenIt works for me, for the most part. I saw my firewall logs and somebody else mentioned some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
It's crazy to have such checking for updates every startup at 24 hour internals with no way to change this is a bit excessive. I disabled whitelist. downloaded the whitelist , modified it to my own liking and stored it as a local file. This add-on would be vastly improved it had a easier to use and more intuitive interface for managing websites if they break. Last update was 3 years ago so I guess that's it for this add-on. - Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćenywot rocksoccer, 3 jaar geledenIt kind of does its job, but as many other reviews mentioned, whitelist is really such a bad idea for most people and most usage scenarios.
I only want to modify the referers for a particular website and that's all. Blacklist will be much better. I know it is not as so-called safe as whitelist, but it will become suitable for much more people. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Artyom, 4 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wojox, 5 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot odysseus, 5 jaar geleden
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Novakof, 5 jaar geleden
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot まさきん, 5 jaar geleden
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 16037335, 5 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Mofiac, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 13541847, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 14392904, 6 jaar geledenIs it really required to use dweb infrastructure to get a tiny whitelist file? My FF shooting a bunch of requests to some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
I thought I've got a malware when I saw that in my log files.
And it takes half an hour to figure out the source of suspicious web traffic. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Anton, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Сырное, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 15254132, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot _ztv, 6 jaar geledenРасширение давно не работает, хватит звездочки ему ставить. Да и белый список давно не обновлялся.
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 13386478, 6 jaar geledenDoesn't seem to work. Simple settings in the FF's about:config work, however.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 13864526, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot GammaGate, 6 jaar geleden
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 12338472, 6 jaar geleden