Pohódnoćenja za 'Improve YouTube!' 🎧 (For YouTube & Video)
'Improve YouTube!' 🎧 (For YouTube & Video) wot code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
Pohódnoćenje wot Wužiwar Firefox 19242234
Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćeny
wot Wužiwar Firefox 19242234, för 6 månader sedanThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so för 5 månader sedan napisałHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We could also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own).
845 pohódnoćenjow
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Mars, för 5 dagar sedanI really love this add on and I don't have a github to bug report, but I wanted to let the dev know that the blocklist isn't working properly. It isn't blacking out/shrinking down blocked content like it used to it just shows back up like nothing happened (both homepage and recommends). I did try clearing my cache to see if it was me but no luck. Appreciate the hard work!
- Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 17631626, för 6 dagar sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 18815780, för 7 dagar sedan
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot AvalonFallen, för 10 dagar sedanDoes not shuffle playlists on Firefox mobile. This is the only extension I could find that claimed to do this, but I was very dissapointed when the option was enabled and the playlist continued in order.
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so för 8 dagar sedan napisałHi! Please consider by the nature of our work you might always find some feature requiring updates after changes to the Youtube website. Our feature automatically activated Youtube's button to shuffle playlists. You can also try if logging out makes a difference. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Zazie, för 11 dagar sedan
- Z 3 z 5 pohódnoćenywot AFMZL, för 12 dagar sedanIm not sure how it is on desktop but it is really buggy on mobile firefox. Whenever you try to look into someone's channel and move to other taps such as the channel's home/videos, it just freezes. It doesn't let your reload nor get out of the page via return button. Also even when it works when you try to click the channel's other shorts it freezes. I tried turning on & off my phone but it still does it. Had to disable the addon.
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so för 12 dagar sedan napisałhi! doesnt depend browser or OS much but m.youtube is a different website so only player features work but not layout. Please file a bug report at https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues looking for errors logged or adding more detail. Thanks
(This type or project should rather be rated for how it does the things it is meant to do not yet m.youtube or what youtube changes today, etc.) - Z 4 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Virtpunk, för 16 dagar sedanEverything is fine, but the video speed does not work in built-in frames, for example, on Nexus
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so för 15 dagar sedan napisałhi, why would it be good there? Generally runs on youtube and youtube's embedded players. Next we can add any video too. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Angius, för 17 dagar sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19709689, för 17 dagar sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Mebe, för 17 dagar sedanThis extension imho is required for YT. No more shorts, no more videos you've already watched, block AI slop channels easily. Props to the devs... (slow clap).
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot URP, för 19 dagar sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19622612, för 20 dagar sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot BillKoochooloo, för 21 dagar sedan
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Marc, för 23 dagar sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot 3ubaidUrRe7man, för 24 dagar sedanThis should be built-in with as a default addon, like ublock origin.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot blxxdyval, för en månad sedan
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot ShadowEri, för en månad sedanWorks fine for the most part, but completely removes the recorded live chat for ALL videos with no options to turn it back on.
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so för 22 dagar sedan napisałThe extension does nothing by default. Please check again and toggle your features one by one. - Z 2 z 5 pohódnoćenywot LS, för en månad sedanPretty outdated by 2026 (eg, Shorts still visible despite trying to hide them, Join buttons hide Improve YouTube options, generally pretty bloated with redundant optionality better covered by other apps or by YT updates enabling such options, etc.)
Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so för 22 dagar sedan napisałmany volunteers already updates this in 2026 alone.
Feel free to rate our 200 features by relevance. - Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot DaiterGd, för en månad sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Roman, för en månad sedanLike some users after installing this extension the fan was overworked with noises. HOWEVER, on closer inspection the issue was likely caused by having the in extension adblocking feature turned on while another adblocker (e.g. uBO or Adguard) was already in use. Simply put, when it comes to - Youtube - adblocker, use either the one within this extension or uBO/AdGuard/Ghostery etc. but never both or more.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot glitch0id, för en månad sedanI wanted the comment section on the right side of the page next to the video and was able to get this done using this extension. Absolute slam dunk.
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Wužiwar Firefox 19661049, för en månad sedan
- Z 5 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Shidoshi Gizmo, för en månad sedan
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot Raeseti, för en månad sedanGreat to begin with, but if you start going through your subscriptions it will bog down and break. And it turns out that the developer doesn't understand that not everyone who installs the extension is not their personal bug report.
- Z 1 z 5 pohódnoćenywot DisplayName, för en månad sedanAdd on makes youtube unusably laggy.
And yes developer this is what reviews are for. They're for leaving information for others about the experience of using the app. "Makes the website it's for unusably slow" is useful information for other users. This isn't a technical or bug support request. It's a review of the functionality of the app.Wotmołwa wuwiwarja
je so för en månad sedan napisałReviews tend to display herd behavior, reviews tend to display herd behavior, while the product is complex and hard to judge. The amount of daily uninstalls is low. This project was updated by over 200 volunteers. There might be a mystery bug only affecting 0.1% of users or 1% of Firefox version users - worth discovering, but depending on you writing a bug report..
I meant Mozilla has rules generally allowing to flag / remove this.