'Improve YouTube!' đ§ (For YouTube & Video) Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©sei
'Improve YouTube!' đ§ (For YouTube & Video) szerzĆ: code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
code-for-charity vĂĄlasza
FejlesztĆi vĂĄlasz
közzétéve: 3 évehi! ℠4.0.17.1 will be live in Firefox any moment with ~100 improvements. Unfortunately we lost our maintainer in 2022, but are getting back on track. We are over 500000 active users and only 1-3 active developers. Every volunteer will help https://github.com/code-for-charity/ImprovedTube-for-YouTube
776 értékelés
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 5 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: Yevhen Tretiakov, 2 ĂłrĂĄja
FejlesztĆi vĂĄlasz
közzétéve: 11 óråjaHi! Please add the mobile URL in our github repo if you will.
This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering).
The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here.)- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 5 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: MetalGear89, 8 napjaFantastic add one. Youtube is awful to use on desktop without it.
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 2 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: Firefox felhasznĂĄlĂł 19465923, 12 napjaThemes and some settings are ok. I just do not like that whenever I switch from a tab to youtube and vice versa, there is a short amount of time where the page reloads. I have no idea why it keeps doing this. It also has issues wherein despite not enabling the "Force videos to start from the beginning", it still forces videos to start from the beginning. It's annoying and worth the uninstall. Hopefully they fix such issues by then
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 5 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: Firefox felhasznĂĄlĂł 18989911, 12 napja
FejlesztĆi vĂĄlasz
közzĂ©tĂ©ve: 11 ĂłrĂĄjahi! This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering). The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 1 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: Firefox felhasznĂĄlĂł 15037318, 16 napjaIt does not even allow me to watch youtube videos after I had installed it!
Test it before making it available! - Very good QQL feature add, however it is extremely performance intensive, do NOT use the build in theme feature 100% will slow down site responsiveness.
Also it would be nice to add a action menu because the YouTube ui keep changing so I can stop seeing buggy UIFejlesztĆi vĂĄlasz
közzétéve: 11 óråjaYou mean full replacement UI?
There currently is a CPU hungry bug only for the moment while you are changing our settings and only in Firefox. - Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 5 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: Firefox felhasznĂĄlĂł 17491097, 20 napja
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 5 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: Carriercarry, 21 napjaHide ugly ai and auto-dubbed. thank you!
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 5 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: Ivia Relle, 22 napja
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 5 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: HoĂ ng HáșŁi Háșu, 24 napja
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 4 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: Firefox felhasznĂĄlĂł 16779275, 25 napja
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 5 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: coldcoffee, egy hĂłnapja
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 5 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: Firefox felhasznĂĄlĂł 19298834, egy hĂłnapjaMakes YouTube usable again!
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 1 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: DOT, egy hĂłnapja
- Csillagos Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©s: 1 / 5kĂ©szĂtette: Firefox felhasznĂĄlĂł 19242234, egy hĂłnapjaThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.FejlesztĆi vĂĄlasz
közzétéve: 23 napjaHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We can also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own).