Ulasan untuk Improve YouTube! (Open-Source for YouTube)
Improve YouTube! (Open-Source for YouTube) oleh code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
Tinjauan oleh Forzaredz
Diberi peringkat 4 dari 5
oleh Forzaredz, 4 bulan yang laluIt's a nice addon so far.. but it'll be better if you made 2 options for automatically change the video resolution.. one for normal mode and one for fullscreen mode. I know you did a similar option (the foucus option).. but for me the fullsreen mode can be more convenient.
I also recommend to make the oprions more user friendly .. like a full page that has all the options.you can visit the enhancer for youtube addon option page to get my point.
But anyway thanks for the addon and please keep updating and enhancing it
I also recommend to make the oprions more user friendly .. like a full page that has all the options.you can visit the enhancer for youtube addon option page to get my point.
But anyway thanks for the addon and please keep updating and enhancing it
Balasan pengembang
dikirim 4 bulan yang laluhi, agree, have written both of that in our to-do lists already long ago. And you could go there to vote for it.
What about joining us on Github? (over 170 people already contributed)
There are over 1000 to-do list items https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues
(4 stars is not helping, reducing the average)
( "so far.. but it'll be better if you made 2 options" many people said such that and it is unaware(/ignorant) of the situation. /Better phrase: "For the wish-list:" )
thanks
What about joining us on Github? (over 170 people already contributed)
There are over 1000 to-do list items https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues
(4 stars is not helping, reducing the average)
( "so far.. but it'll be better if you made 2 options" many people said such that and it is unaware(/ignorant) of the situation. /Better phrase: "For the wish-list:" )
thanks
776 ulasan
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Yevhen Tretiakov, sehari yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 3 dari 5oleh stapuft, 6 hari yang laluWorks allright, but on mobile, you have tonswitch to "desktop mode" to make some features work, like automatically redirecting from the shitty "shorts" page to the actual YouTube page for the video.
Balasan pengembang
dikirim 2 hari yang laluHi! Please add the mobile URL in our github repo if you will.
This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering).
The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here.) - Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh PP, 8 hari yang laluSeems to work for me. Haven't come across any issues for my uses
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Lakyn, 9 hari yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh MetalGear89, 9 hari yang laluFantastic add one. Youtube is awful to use on desktop without it.
- Diberi peringkat 2 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 19465923, 13 hari yang laluThemes and some settings are ok. I just do not like that whenever I switch from a tab to youtube and vice versa, there is a short amount of time where the page reloads. I have no idea why it keeps doing this. It also has issues wherein despite not enabling the "Force videos to start from the beginning", it still forces videos to start from the beginning. It's annoying and worth the uninstall. Hopefully they fix such issues by then
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 18989911, 13 hari yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 2 dari 5oleh TS, 16 hari yang laluIt's very hit or miss if any of its features actually work on mobile. The interface is trash and the prevent autoplay toggle blocks the video from loading entirely.
Balasan pengembang
dikirim 2 hari yang laluhi! This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering). The descriptions sais (+preparing mobile m.youtube). Please give fair feedback. (We can flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep this information visible right here - Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 15037318, 17 hari yang laluIt does not even allow me to watch youtube videos after I had installed it!
Test it before making it available! - Diberi peringkat 3 dari 5oleh ueeu, 18 hari yang laluVery good QQL feature add, however it is extremely performance intensive, do NOT use the build in theme feature 100% will slow down site responsiveness.
Also it would be nice to add a action menu because the YouTube ui keep changing so I can stop seeing buggy UI
Edit: CPU usage wise I think so, but it seems to also interfere with page loading, most of the time for me it's a blank pageBalasan pengembang
dikirim 2 hari yang laluYou mean full replacement UI?
There currently is a CPU hungry bug only for the moment while you are changing our settings and only in Firefox. - Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Vangxim, 20 hari yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5oleh SzymonL, 20 hari yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 17491097, 21 hari yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Carriercarry, 23 hari yang laluHide ugly ai and auto-dubbed. thank you!
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Cboom, 23 hari yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Ivia Relle, 23 hari yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Hoàng Hải Hậu, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 4 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 16779275, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh coldcoffee, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 19298834, sebulan yang laluMakes YouTube usable again!
- Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5oleh DOT, sebulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 19242234, sebulan yang laluThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.Balasan pengembang
dikirim 24 hari yang laluHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We can also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own).