Recensioni per NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite di Giorgio Maone
Recensione di Utente Firefox 12839
Valutata 2 su 5
di Utente Firefox 12839, 8 anni faEDIT: OK after some time playing around with the settings I understand it much better and the functionality appears to work well. I suggest people experiment with the settings a bit, or check out the noscript forum where there are some explanations of the UI if you find the relevant threads.
In the meantime, I will keep my 2-star rating until a proper help guide to the UI is incorporated into the addon as a link, and an on-boarding process for new installations includes a pop up alerting users to the guide as this is sorely needed, especially for users of the old add-on. This rating reflects my experience as a new user, not my experience now, as this is more relevant to potential new users reading these reviews.
---
I agree with others that I do not really know how to use this addon any more whereas I had perfect intuition of it pre-57 days. The interface is non-intuitive and is not really explained anywhere. After some time I think I am beginning to understand it but I am still not sure because I cannot reference what I think against official documentation. The latter would help a lot.
I don't blame the addon developer, as he probably had to develop it in his spare time in time for release 57. i acknowledge the effort to upgrade the addon to the new API while many other developers gave up. Thank you, Giorgio for that.
I do blame Mozilla somewhat for switching to a substandard extension API and not having certain vital API features available to developers to test until very late (and some not even yet existing). I realise there were some reasons to make the change, but they should have considered the effect on the existing users and developers and tried to mitigate it somehow.
While I agree that expressing such anger in obscene words is inappropriate, it is appropriate to give an honest review and rating. My rating expresses what I currently think about this addon and is by no means an emotional reaction to change.
I am sure that many improvements will come and user feedback will be acknowledged by the developer. I encourage him to ignore the insults and continue. My review and rating will improve as the addon improves in my estimation.
In the meantime, I will keep my 2-star rating until a proper help guide to the UI is incorporated into the addon as a link, and an on-boarding process for new installations includes a pop up alerting users to the guide as this is sorely needed, especially for users of the old add-on. This rating reflects my experience as a new user, not my experience now, as this is more relevant to potential new users reading these reviews.
---
I agree with others that I do not really know how to use this addon any more whereas I had perfect intuition of it pre-57 days. The interface is non-intuitive and is not really explained anywhere. After some time I think I am beginning to understand it but I am still not sure because I cannot reference what I think against official documentation. The latter would help a lot.
I don't blame the addon developer, as he probably had to develop it in his spare time in time for release 57. i acknowledge the effort to upgrade the addon to the new API while many other developers gave up. Thank you, Giorgio for that.
I do blame Mozilla somewhat for switching to a substandard extension API and not having certain vital API features available to developers to test until very late (and some not even yet existing). I realise there were some reasons to make the change, but they should have considered the effect on the existing users and developers and tried to mitigate it somehow.
While I agree that expressing such anger in obscene words is inappropriate, it is appropriate to give an honest review and rating. My rating expresses what I currently think about this addon and is by no means an emotional reaction to change.
I am sure that many improvements will come and user feedback will be acknowledged by the developer. I encourage him to ignore the insults and continue. My review and rating will improve as the addon improves in my estimation.
2.365 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Sembler, 3 giorni fa
- Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 15056996, 12 giorni faissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Valutata 5 su 5di 镂心鉥肝, 18 giorni faNoScript还是很好的，不管是界面还是解释如何使用都进行了改进。不过，文章内容应该更加简洁一点。告诉用户每一个功能开关的意思。同时NoScript默认会阻止扩展脚本
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 17847461, 19 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18989716, 21 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Max, 21 giorni faI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Valutata 5 su 5di LittleFire, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Absinthe, un mese fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di thofree, un mese faGets detected by Youtube's anti ad-block stuff. Wish you had a button to turn it off easily for a website without disabling it entirely.
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 18920843, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18315395, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di VonD68, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Retromania, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Luciano Rangel, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18924473, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18903740, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 15309210, 2 mesi faSimply top. I've been using the extension for years and I'm still delighted with it. I can control exactly which website is allowed to do what.