Recensioni per NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite di Giorgio Maone
Risposta di Giorgio Maone
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 8 anni fa"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
2.389 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18710229, 4 ore faThis add-on works as intended and has saved me from a lot of potential problems and annoying website antics.
- Valutata 3 su 5di Air, 12 giorni faVery useful on a computer, however, enabling it by default on a mobile phone will block many important features, including but not limited to any AI features and video browsing
- Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 19157064, 19 giorni faCompletely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Cory Sanin, 20 giorni faOne star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19145735, 21 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di And?, 25 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di A Tea Daze, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di srzlt, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di jordan9543, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di vit55555, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18218075, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di fiendkaka, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Shannon Sobeck, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Flyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19088604, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di kk, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19072892, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di cwqing1973, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 14468519, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di rabbitshee, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19047433, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di A. Bilmanda, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Lazer Bear, 2 mesi fa