Recensioni per Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes di Shinigami Eyes
Recensione di sara
Valutata 5 su 5
di sara, 17 giorni fa1372 recensioni
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 19890855, un giorno faI am transfem, and despite this I was marked red by an ex-mutual for petty interpersonal drama, and have been unable to reverse this. I have also seen so many others have similar experiences. I personally believe going into an account or link with your own judgment and eyes is a more consistent and wise thing to do to make your space online feel safest for you.
- Valutata 4 su 5di witty, un giorno faThe one star reviews are (mostly) because transmisogynists are upset they got marked red for their transmisogyny, and can be ignored. In most cases, the extension functions as intended. Particularly so for people marked red, being marked green is a little more iffy.
- Valutata 5 su 5di mementomemory, 2 giorni faDon't listen to the 1 star reviews. They're all written by transandrophobia truthers. This app is great and I highly recommend it.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Moon, 2 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 18576472, 5 giorni faLargely overrun by weird tumblr trans women who hate anyone AFAB these days. Considering how just being transmasc or thinking pedophilia is bad will get you flagged red.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19866997, 7 giorni faThis app is being falsely review-bombed by TERFs and transmisogynists. You only get marked red if you're vocally anti trans and participate in harassment campaigns against trans people. "Transandrophobia" perpetrated by trans women is not a real issue, its not a thing systemically or individually, and it's crypto-TERF rhetoric.
This is a good extension. - Valutata 1 su 5di lucyisbored, 8 giorni faImmensely racist and transandrophobic. Also loves to defend pedos, for some reason.
- Valutata 1 su 5di paradoxkin, 9 giorni faI am a gender nonconforming trans individual who is outspoken about my support for queer rights, but I found myself marked red on shinigami eyes after someone I got into a petty online disagreement with had all of their friends to mark me as unsafe. This is an issue I've seen repeat over the last multiple years, and it's only gotten worse with time. This used to be a really useful extension, but it's been warped and weaponized against the very community that built it. I can't say I recommend it anymore because it does not accurately identify transphobia/queerphobia as it used to.
- Valutata 1 su 5di felis, 9 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di solca, 10 giorni faStill very good -- not flawless, but absolutely reliable enough for five stars as long as you remember that it is solely a measure of unconditional trans-friendliness, not a "good person" stamp; you could theoretically be a green-flagged Pinkerton if you have unwavering support for trans people, and your sweet kindly grandma who was at Stonewall can be red-flagged if she posted too much about how much she liked What Is A Woman. There's a lot of overlap between transphobes and generally hateful people, but it's important to remember as a (potential) user that's not a perfect overlap.
If anyone's wondering why reviews are so contentious recently, it's because the extension doesn't just red-flag for general transphobia, but also for transmisogyny specifically -- even if the user is friendly towards nb/transmasc folks. This means some of that group is confused that they, a trans person, are being thrown in with the TERFs and conservatives when they were actually stamped that way for being transmisogynistic. The exact bound of what constitutes transmisogyny is vulnerable to infighting, but it's still extremely rare for it to actually cause an issue, and in that case you gotta use your brain.
Maybe someone will make an extension that will green-flag people who support only the part of the community they belong to, but I certainly prefer the stricter requirement that people actually support the entire trans community.
Thanks devs for a very useful extension! - Valutata 1 su 5di sharkbaitcrochet, 12 giorni faGenuinely does not serve its intended purpose anymore. People that make threats against trans men and transmascs are marked green but anyone who speaks out against anti transmasculinity, exorsexism, or intersexism is marked red. Trans men and transmascs speaking about their experiences and putting a name to that experience isn't a threat to trans women or transfems.
- Valutata 1 su 5di spiinniing, 12 giorni faUsed to be useful. Infiltrated by TERFs, overrun with racism, exorsexism, and lateral transphobia. Cannot speak for other social media sites as I don't use them, but it's useless on tumblr. It used to be if I saw a red name and checked, nearly 100% of the time it was a TERF/radfem or otherwise transphobe. Now, if I see a red name, nearly 100% of the time it's just a trans masculine person or an intersex person. It seems like he/him in bio is enough to get you marked red on this extension now lmfao. Would not recommend, hope an alternative that seeks to protect ALL trans people is created.
- Valutata 1 su 5di confusedbug, 15 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Abotoggar, 15 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 17289853, 17 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di gigi, 17 giorni fathis add-on is actually rlly reliable if you fully comprehend *why* the people who are marked red/green are marked red/green. it's not about whether or not you're "nice" or are "normal," it's about whether or not you're safe for trans people to be around; specifically, *transfeminine* people, as they are the most vulnerable members of the trans community, and anyone who isn't safe for them shouldn't be considered "trans friendly." that's really all there is to it. useful extension!!! although i agree with people who say it would be nice to know why certain people were marked red/green, the context would be useful too
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19830850, 17 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19829880, 18 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di oMorri, 18 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Lavender, 22 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Heather, 25 giorni fa