Recensioni per SingleFile
SingleFile di gildas
Recensione di Utente Firefox 15950945
Valutata 3 su 5
di Utente Firefox 15950945, 5 anni faGood idea in general but it seems to have problems with pictures, just an example
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
https://www.rotan2.pt/
Only the big picture at the top is visible after saving the page (and the text columns are changing from right to left and back again after the positions where the pictures are at the original page), no other pctures are shown, I checked ticking and unticking the picture options "Saving delayed pctures..." (not sure about "delayed", here in German "zurückgestellte Bilder") but this does not make any difference
UnMHT on Firefox 56 saves the page with all the pictures and I see it exactly as on my screen before saving it including the text columns at the right positions, too. (page saved with SingleFile is about 67 mb without pictures, page saved with UnMHT is about 44 mb and has all the pictures)
Edit: It was not meant as a bug report.
Website see above saved with SavePage WE (never used so far) is much smaller than the one saved with SingleFile but otherwise exactly looks the same that is without the pictures etc. No idea why, not comfortable of course, seems that the mht format was the much better option for me at least
961 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19048867, 3 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di A. Bilmanda, 6 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di pnkntr, 14 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19016964, 18 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Toukon, 24 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di ali, 25 giorni fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di tuxmux, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18680106, un mese faWorks exactly as advertised, finally pressing Ctrl+S actually does what it's supposed to instead of making a broken document.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Soren, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di LCharlles, un mese faThis can deal with many pages that are not correctly saved in default setting of firefox
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18978921, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di addonexplorer, un mese faExcellent archival tool! These days you cannot trust that any page will be available or drastically modified in the future.
SingleFile grabs everything or just parts, incredibly usefu and I use this along with Obsidian webclipper + Obsidian. - Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18977738, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di OverLordGoldDragon, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18702861, 2 mesi faI rarely give reviews but this one I must. It worked out of box. Can do things even FireShot can't such as saving the page or portion of it in a single html file! Very useful for saving a website or web page on Internet Archive.