Recensioni per FoxFilter
FoxFilter di Inspired Effect
Recensione di davegod75
80 recensioni
- Hello, I'm currently testing parental control systems to see which adult content tagging systems they respect. Even with "Examine Meta Content" turned on in the sensitivity settings, this extension fails to block websites based on various meta tags used by adult websites to identify themselves as such.
I've tested the following meta tags in use by adult websites and none of them cause the page to be blocked:
<meta name="rating" content="adult" />
<meta name="rating" content="mature" />
<meta name="RATING" content="RTA-5042-1996-1400-1577-RTA" />
<meta name="rating" content="RTA-5042-1996-1400-1577-RTA" />
This let me access at least two websites and various twitter accounts with explicit pornographic content which would otherwise have been blocked.
Also, all adult sites I've checked so far include at least one of these tags. - Valutata 5 su 5di Kuriakose, 11 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di HDDHSER, un mese fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 18974369, 3 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18940725, 4 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18639388, 10 mesi fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Radu, un anno fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Tushar Sharma, un anno fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18512180, un anno fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 18410251, un anno faA bloquer l'accès à des sites pour faire les devoirs de mes enfants. Demande de payer pour débloquer le site. Extension à fuir.
- Valutata 3 su 5di Yoann Moreau, un anno faNot so smart.
- When opening links in a tab, the filter will block the current page instead of the new tab.
- Filtering is quite basic and will have many false positive and false negative.
- Access to extension settings is protected with a ugly workaround, not convenient at all, and not secured anyway. - Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 16976370, 2 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 17517208, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 17490130, 3 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Mephistopheles, 3 anni faWorks, but uses the shady practice of not being able to set a password unless you pay them, so even if it's there, anybody can just turn it off anyway
Edit: Even if you pay them, trying to install the android version says not intended for android,wtf??Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 3 anni faHi, we offer all of the filtering options free of charge as a way to try out FoxFilter. In order help cover our expenses, we do charge a very minimal annual fee of $12.99, which we feel is very affordable. We are equally frustrated about Google Android only selectively supporting approximately 200 Chrome extensions for some reason, even though all Chrome extensions were installable on Android at one point. Feel free to reach out to us at foxfilter@inspiredeffect.com to discuss this more. Best regards, FoxFilter Team