Recensioni per Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool di LanguageTooler GmbH
Recensione di Endless Fantasy
Valutata 2 su 5
di Endless Fantasy, un anno faTwo stars for not including an option to select, an “Any dialect” in the which dialect to use dropdown, or select multiple as a bubble, as either a basic or advanced option.
I consider this a critical feature of any language tool, especially a spell check.
I'd also like to be able to select “Show both as a suggestion” For these features of premium let alone recommend it as a user I want more freedom of expression in how I type, sometimes to type in standard “wrong” variations and even recommend them (The horror!!!):
Wrong Punctuation
Incorrect Word Combinations
Advanced Missing Commas
Foreign Terms
It's also lacking several important features such as custom dictionaries from what I can tell.
There's no excuse for not loading from standard formats for this.
Review was edited using this software.
The software also disguises telling you about "Advanced" errors, as a form of very blatant advertisement, and front-loads its AI paraphrasing, and rewriting system as much as it reasonably can without impacting the user experience.
As a user I don't want this, I don't want to know if I made an advanced spelling mistake, because I know that The software does not support that because I read the page, I expect no scanning, not ad's for scanning disguised as good faith showcasing of your product, or the user's failures.
It needs to be a default off option like "Enable scanning of user text for premium features, to warn user about their mistakes" would be ideal.
There's not even any options clutter yet, good work, but its not configurable enough.
Id say my review rating is: Stalker HoC's reception.
I consider this a critical feature of any language tool, especially a spell check.
I'd also like to be able to select “Show both as a suggestion” For these features of premium let alone recommend it as a user I want more freedom of expression in how I type, sometimes to type in standard “wrong” variations and even recommend them (The horror!!!):
Wrong Punctuation
Incorrect Word Combinations
Advanced Missing Commas
Foreign Terms
It's also lacking several important features such as custom dictionaries from what I can tell.
There's no excuse for not loading from standard formats for this.
Review was edited using this software.
The software also disguises telling you about "Advanced" errors, as a form of very blatant advertisement, and front-loads its AI paraphrasing, and rewriting system as much as it reasonably can without impacting the user experience.
As a user I don't want this, I don't want to know if I made an advanced spelling mistake, because I know that The software does not support that because I read the page, I expect no scanning, not ad's for scanning disguised as good faith showcasing of your product, or the user's failures.
It needs to be a default off option like "Enable scanning of user text for premium features, to warn user about their mistakes" would be ideal.
There's not even any options clutter yet, good work, but its not configurable enough.
Id say my review rating is: Stalker HoC's reception.
4704 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Eduardo Jorge Rauch, 2 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Daniel, 3 giorni faIt's announced that the whole extension is going to be locked behind the Premium subscription. While I understand the need to make money, the costs are not reasonable for me and my usage. I also don't like your explanation that this is because of the rising costs of the AI-features, which I didn't need nor was convinced of to begin with.
You can circumvent this (for now?) if you set up your own server, but I think I prefer to part ways at this point. - Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 18370752, 4 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Thomas, 4 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Pottie, 4 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di 98juanfelipe, 6 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di babygenius55, 8 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Ronaldo Silva, 9 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Lee, 9 giorni faReally used to love this until it started using gen AI more and more and kept finding more errors in its checks.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Spencer, 11 giorni fa
- Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 19640046, 11 giorni faFirst I must say the extensions primary function works really well, if that is all you care about ignore the 2 star score or the rest of the review.
Where I feel missed led is the "recommended" tag from Firefox. I assumed it guaranteed some sort of privacy/protection grantee or criteria that had to be followed. It apparently does not as I read the policy of both the larger company and the specifics of the extension. Their overarching policy of Learneo(main company) in general is horrendous with AI trained on your data and selling you info to third party sight and much more.
The worst in my opinion that stems from the extension is that it will send 15 strings (symbols like letters and numbers) before and after EVERY ignored suggestion. This might include personal sensitive details such as, passwords, emails and much more.
So yeah if you care about privacy or privet details don't enable it on most sights or remove the extension entirely.
(Be aware though that removing it will send them information like the URL for the last website used the service on) - Valutata 1 su 5di D G, 14 giorni faJust like grammarly pushing the premium very hard. I'm not going to pay for this.
- Valutata 5 su 5di SkatingScarletMask, 16 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Joao Pinto, 18 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Marv, 18 giorni faOne free grammar check, and then if I want to keep going I need to get a subscription... what's even the point of this "free" add-on?
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19631719, 20 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18789849, 21 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Hari T. Napitupulu, 22 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Isaac J. C., 22 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 16681739, 22 giorni fa
- Valutata 2 su 5di SahOra07, 23 giorni faSans blague c'est le correcteur le plus recommandé alors qu'il ne connait pas des mots tout simples tel que "moi" ou "depuis" et la liste est tres longue!!! du coup il ne me sert qu'a moitié limite a rien puisque je dois moi meme rechercher les fautes non detectées! donc desolée mais hop ca dégage dans les 30 secondes qui suivront cet avis objectif... DESINSTALLATION :) et j'ai beau chercher apparemment aucun correcteur n'est efficace et/ou demande des renseignements totalement inutiles que l'on ne possede meme pas en tant qu'utilisateur lambda.(MerciApp par exemple! meme pas testé puisque je n'ai pas pu repondre a toutes leurs exigences... bref) dans l'espoir de voir un jour apparaitre un correcteur digne de ce nom et efficace sans etre trop intrusif non plus dans les conditions d'installation et bien entendu GRATUIT! a bon entendeur :)
- Valutata 3 su 5di 123, 23 giorni fa
- Valutata 3 su 5di Nova, 24 giorni faSometimes can give a lot of good fixes and suggestions in replacing phrases, but I've been encountering a lot of incorrect markings. It will say to capitalize a word, specifically at the start of a new line even when it's not a new sentence (not even the start of a new paragraph). When I "add to personal dictionary" it remembers for some time, then completely forgets afterwards, telling me to change it again.
- Valutata 1 su 5di AmkiTakk, un mese faExtension is now premium-only. A shame, because I was a consistent user before then, even getting premium once or twice when I could afford it. Unfortunately, I have other things I need to pay for, and a spellchecker is very much not a priority. I will be getting back to my browser's default spellchecker.