Recensioni per NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite di Giorgio Maone
Recensione di Utente Firefox 13504819
Valutata 3 su 5
di Utente Firefox 13504819, 8 anni faFirst of all thank you for all the effort you put into the new Quantum-enabled version of NoScript. I can imagine, it took a lot of time to rewrite this extension, which had been developed for years, completely from scratch.
It is noticable that the new version has been written in a big hurry. The UI is not fully developed and looks like it was made for newbies than for experienced computer users. I know, the UI cannot be changed back. We all will have to accept that XUL is gone. I don't think, the new UI is bad in general. It is just not finished yet.
Sadly, some very important features are still missing. For me personally, giving temporary permissions to a website is a must-have feature. I think this is such a key component that I wonder why it has not been implemented yet. How am I supposed to test a website? Giving it permanent permissions and later revoking them again is not a very effective way.
There are still a lot of things to be done. However, I think a huge step was made already. The basic functionality is now implemented as a WebExtension with more functionality to follow. Keep up the good work. I am sure, the comments and ratings of NoScript will become better soon.
It is noticable that the new version has been written in a big hurry. The UI is not fully developed and looks like it was made for newbies than for experienced computer users. I know, the UI cannot be changed back. We all will have to accept that XUL is gone. I don't think, the new UI is bad in general. It is just not finished yet.
Sadly, some very important features are still missing. For me personally, giving temporary permissions to a website is a must-have feature. I think this is such a key component that I wonder why it has not been implemented yet. How am I supposed to test a website? Giving it permanent permissions and later revoking them again is not a very effective way.
There are still a lot of things to be done. However, I think a huge step was made already. The basic functionality is now implemented as a WebExtension with more functionality to follow. Keep up the good work. I am sure, the comments and ratings of NoScript will become better soon.
2.373 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19072892, un giorno fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di cwqing1973, 5 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 14468519, 6 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di rabbitshee, 8 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19047433, 10 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di A. Bilmanda, 13 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Lazer Bear, 13 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Sembler, 22 giorni fa
- Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 15056996, un mese faissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Valutata 5 su 5di 镂心鉥肝, un mese faNoScript还是很好的,不管是界面还是解释如何使用都进行了改进。不过,文章内容应该更加简洁一点。告诉用户每一个功能开关的意思。同时NoScript默认会阻止扩展脚本
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 17847461, un mese fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18989716, un mese fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Max, un mese faI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Valutata 5 su 5di LittleFire, un mese fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 18920843, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18315395, 2 mesi fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Retromania, 2 mesi fa