Recensioni per TinEye Reverse Image Search
TinEye Reverse Image Search di TinEye
290 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Great King, 8 anni faThis makes my work so much faster... I do a lot of searches a day! Fantastic, Thanks a bunch.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 13280747, 8 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Bilgerat984, 8 anni faI did a reverse lookup with TinEye on a suspected Craigslist scammer. The reason I did the lookup is an image on an ad only hours old showed up on Google on another web site, while looking up the specs on that particular boat. TinEye failed to find the Google image from the Craigslist image. I then tried the reverse & TinEye also failed to find the Craigslist image from the Google image.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 13063215, 8 anni fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 6490726, 8 anni faVersion 1.2.2 works well.
But I can't install the new version (1.3/1.3.1). FF (53.0.3 on Win7) tells me the addon file is corrupt.Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 8 anni faHello Lupin_III,
Would you mind sending us an email at support@tineye.com about this issue? We can follow up more easily by email. Thank you! - Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 6565934, 8 anni faHow i can remove tinye from context menu of tab (new or open).
Thx for answer. Firefox 53 - Valutata 3 su 5di mike20021969, 8 anni faRunning Firefox 52.0.2 ESR, I'm getting the same message as I did with 1.3.0 - "The add-on downloaded from this site could not be installed because it appears to be corrupt".
Are the developers aware of this?Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 8 anni faHello mike20021969,
Sorry to hear you've been having this issue with our extension. We haven't been able to reproduce this issue on our end. Would you be able to share what operating system you are using and maybe send a screenshot of your error to support@tineye.com? Thank you! - Valutata 4 su 5di PERCE-NEIGE, 8 anni faMore complete than "Image Search for Tineye", because it has the ability to search image AND the whole page. But I prefer "Image Search..." because I don't really need this feature.