Recensioni per Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context di Wikiwand
Recensione di somna
I don't think this is for me - it's so unlike Wikipedia. I did start to appreciate it after trying it for some time (I especially like the nav bar on the left), but I also encountered quite a lot of issues, so I think I'll stick to regular Wikipedia in the meantime.
- Infoboxes look terrible. Images are off-center and the infobox is too close to the body of the article.
- Tables are sometimes split up when they have multiple headers.
- I also think content in tables needs more horizontal padding.
Dark mode certainly needs more work.
- Some elements still have a light background and the light text on it is difficult to see.
- Links in dark mode are gray, which is absurd.
- The text is a bit too bright for me. Either a lighter background or darker text would be easier on the eyes.
- Page previews disappear too slowly when my cursor moves away from it. Waiting for one to go away gets annoying when I'm trying to read the article content.
- The font looks horrid when both italicized and bold.
I understand that some of these issues might be caused by Wikipedia's own architecture, but I'm opting out regardless.
- Infoboxes look terrible. Images are off-center and the infobox is too close to the body of the article.
- Tables are sometimes split up when they have multiple headers.
- I also think content in tables needs more horizontal padding.
Dark mode certainly needs more work.
- Some elements still have a light background and the light text on it is difficult to see.
- Links in dark mode are gray, which is absurd.
- The text is a bit too bright for me. Either a lighter background or darker text would be easier on the eyes.
- Page previews disappear too slowly when my cursor moves away from it. Waiting for one to go away gets annoying when I'm trying to read the article content.
- The font looks horrid when both italicized and bold.
I understand that some of these issues might be caused by Wikipedia's own architecture, but I'm opting out regardless.
672 recensioni
- Valutata 1 su 5di Howar31, un mese fatoo much useless features. settings are not saved keep resetting. and also ads
- The extension used to be good but now they're pushing users to subscribe, don't follow dark mode by default anymore (it resets every couple of days or so), and push the AI tab too much.
(And apparently, it has way too much ads, which I don't see because I use an ad blocker anyway) - Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 19053100, 2 mesi faUsed to be really good, now it's infested with ads (ON A WIKIPEDIA SKIN, a notably ad free site) and AI bullshit everywhere, asking for a subscription. It also automatically blocks access to actual wikipedia, by automatically rerouting every article to their skin of it. No even entering the wikipedia website manually can you there with this extension installed. Where can i just get this extension, but how it was 2 or 3 years ago?
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 19114790, 4 mesi fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Indiana Moon, 5 mesi faIt does not "enhance user experience" as stated in the add-on description section. It was good once.
Enshittification! - Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 19063414, 5 mesi faWikiwand was great, but now it's infested with AI popups, ads and the constant bugging to make an account. A shame because it used to be a great tool, now it's more work to click all the nonsense away.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 14503325, 5 mesi fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 19040033, 5 mesi faUsed to be a great addon but now totally destroyed by the Ads and AI
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 14706773, 5 mesi fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 19035698, 5 mesi faEnshittification everywhere. Was a very nice plugin to cleanly read wikipedia, now cluttered with AI and ads
- They had the nerve to actually BLOCK people from accessing entire wikipedia pages. You are required to watch an ad before you can access the page. This is allegedly to have access to their "wikicontent," which is not needed or desired. This app used to be good. But pulling this crap was a step too far. You CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE MONEY FROM ADS.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 17979558, 6 mesi fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Milan Regec, 6 mesi faAll it does now is infest your Wikipedia with ads. Don't bother installing and I highly recommend uninstalling it if you already did so. Even when uninstalled, it keeps coming back and keeps stealing all Wikipedia links.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 18996590, 6 mesi fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Toccetness, 6 mesi faAd-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 17669402, 6 mesi faAs many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.