Firefox Multi-Account Containers のレビュー
Firefox Multi-Account Containers 作成者: Firefox
Augusto によるレビュー
The UX is horrible. This extension have a design problem with the "No container" state:
* You can move a website to a container, but you can't take it out of a container.
* Moreover you can't choose "no container" as default state for a website if you have chosen a container previously.
* Also the extension always remember your last container for a website and you aren't able to disable that "feature".
Please review the "Cookie Swap" extension, which is much more simple (but it has some bugs unfortunately).
* You can move a website to a container, but you can't take it out of a container.
* Moreover you can't choose "no container" as default state for a website if you have chosen a container previously.
* Also the extension always remember your last container for a website and you aren't able to disable that "feature".
Please review the "Cookie Swap" extension, which is much more simple (but it has some bugs unfortunately).
合計レビュー数: 7,921
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Firefox ユーザー 14066212 によるレビュー (19時間前)A must have, cannot imagine my workflow without it anymore.
- 5 段階中 4 の評価Benjamin MOREAUX によるレビュー (2日前)Very handy for managing multiple M365 or Google tenants.
For me, the only thing missing is the ability to have “private browsing” containers and a way to always open in a container, for example when editing a bookmark. - 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 19794127 によるレビュー (3日前)
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Firefox ユーザー 14150725 によるレビュー (6日前)
- 5 段階中 3 の評価Firefox ユーザー 14541632 によるレビュー (6日前)Recently it's been impossible to remove a site from the 'managed site list' - after a short period it re-appears. Perhaps its an integration issue with FF sync, or occurred when FF revamping the profiles management.
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Jawa D. WAI によるレビュー (8日前)
- So, what do we have here? A mockery from Firefox. Let's go back to the proxy form - it expects "type://host:ip", but what do we actually get? No SOCKS5 support. I enter "SOCKS5://ip:port", and it complains about an unsupported record type. And the proxy has been verified as working. It simply wouldn't work with any functional proxy.
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Mike Breytentebach によるレビュー (21日前)
- l💗ve the concept, the excution is not working so well for me at present - I am not sure where the issue is, whether its in relation to my password keeper or the sites I am accessing (particularly where there is MFA).
Some are just getting caught in a constant login error loop (personally, I think its the sites - Xero, you are the main culprit, and its not unique to this browser or function).
I am new to containers, so still working out how to use them but I desperately want it to work as Chrome profiles have been an ongoing resource vampire. - 5 段階中 5 の評価Firefox ユーザー 15136226 によるレビュー (22日前)
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 13036198 によるレビュー (1ヶ月前)I was enjoying this but I keep losing the containers. I have added containers twice only to find that it had once again disappeared.