Firefox Multi-Account Containers のレビュー
Firefox Multi-Account Containers 作成者: Firefox
aba によるレビュー
A good idea but completely unfinished.
Sync to a new browser always merges the default configuration without asking. The Sync does not sync the 'limit to designated sites' option, so you have to manually apply that to all the categories (while you clean out the merged in default configuration).
Management of the categories is woefully sub-par; how is there no way to manually add domains or wildcard domains to a category? Try keeping a service like Google in a 'limited' category and watch the SSO explode every time you go to maps dot google dot com because the browser doesn't stay on the auth redirect long enough to add it to the container though the UI.
It also breaks the firefox profiler, as the profiler can't load profiles from outside the category.
None of this bothered me when this feature was new, but it's been years. I wish I could recommend this and use it in earnest.
Sync to a new browser always merges the default configuration without asking. The Sync does not sync the 'limit to designated sites' option, so you have to manually apply that to all the categories (while you clean out the merged in default configuration).
Management of the categories is woefully sub-par; how is there no way to manually add domains or wildcard domains to a category? Try keeping a service like Google in a 'limited' category and watch the SSO explode every time you go to maps dot google dot com because the browser doesn't stay on the auth redirect long enough to add it to the container though the UI.
It also breaks the firefox profiler, as the profiler can't load profiles from outside the category.
None of this bothered me when this feature was new, but it's been years. I wish I could recommend this and use it in earnest.
合計レビュー数: 7,921
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Firefox ユーザー 14066212 によるレビュー (9時間前)A must have, cannot imagine my workflow without it anymore.
- 5 段階中 4 の評価Benjamin MOREAUX によるレビュー (1日前)Very handy for managing multiple M365 or Google tenants.
For me, the only thing missing is the ability to have “private browsing” containers and a way to always open in a container, for example when editing a bookmark. - 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 19794127 によるレビュー (2日前)
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Firefox ユーザー 14150725 によるレビュー (5日前)
- 5 段階中 3 の評価Firefox ユーザー 14541632 によるレビュー (6日前)Recently it's been impossible to remove a site from the 'managed site list' - after a short period it re-appears. Perhaps its an integration issue with FF sync, or occurred when FF revamping the profiles management.
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Jawa D. WAI によるレビュー (8日前)
- So, what do we have here? A mockery from Firefox. Let's go back to the proxy form - it expects "type://host:ip", but what do we actually get? No SOCKS5 support. I enter "SOCKS5://ip:port", and it complains about an unsupported record type. And the proxy has been verified as working. It simply wouldn't work with any functional proxy.
- 5 段階中 5 の評価Mike Breytentebach によるレビュー (20日前)
- l💗ve the concept, the excution is not working so well for me at present - I am not sure where the issue is, whether its in relation to my password keeper or the sites I am accessing (particularly where there is MFA).
Some are just getting caught in a constant login error loop (personally, I think its the sites - Xero, you are the main culprit, and its not unique to this browser or function).
I am new to containers, so still working out how to use them but I desperately want it to work as Chrome profiles have been an ongoing resource vampire. - 5 段階中 5 の評価Firefox ユーザー 15136226 によるレビュー (22日前)
- 5 段階中 1 の評価Firefox ユーザー 13036198 によるレビュー (1ヶ月前)I was enjoying this but I keep losing the containers. I have added containers twice only to find that it had once again disappeared.