NoScript Security Suite-ის მიმოხილვები
NoScript Security Suite ავტორი Giorgio Maone
მიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 13551624
2 შეფასება 5-დან
მიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 13551624, 8 წლის წინIt is a real pitty that you do not seem to want to listen to the incredible ammount of people who are trying to tell you that you messed this up.
If 90% of the people dont understand the new UI, its not the people, its the UI. For example the list is too large, and without an explaination you cant tell the status of an entry. And if -by accident- you manage to click what was "allow" before you have no idea if its temparily allowed or permanently.
I gave this addon another try today and now I get at least one XSS warning popup every 30 seconds. I mean popups? Really? Reminds me of the old personal firewall days, when you got so much warningsall the time, that after a while you just allwed everything just to be left in peace. Popups are a bad, bad, bad idea.
Please recreate the old look and feel and behaviour!
And I get from your comments that you cant do that exactly, but I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible. Even if it does not look fancy and colorful like now. Because belive it or not, that is obviously not what people care about.
If 90% of the people dont understand the new UI, its not the people, its the UI. For example the list is too large, and without an explaination you cant tell the status of an entry. And if -by accident- you manage to click what was "allow" before you have no idea if its temparily allowed or permanently.
I gave this addon another try today and now I get at least one XSS warning popup every 30 seconds. I mean popups? Really? Reminds me of the old personal firewall days, when you got so much warningsall the time, that after a while you just allwed everything just to be left in peace. Popups are a bad, bad, bad idea.
Please recreate the old look and feel and behaviour!
And I get from your comments that you cant do that exactly, but I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible. Even if it does not look fancy and colorful like now. Because belive it or not, that is obviously not what people care about.
შემმუშავებლის პასუხი
თარიღი 8 წლის წინ"I dont see a reason why one could not try to recreate that as close as possible".
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
*This* is as close as possible a WebExtension can go, and I've done and I'm doing my best to compensate the unavoidable loss in usability (due to the fact WebExtensions UI are just HTML web pages) with more customizability, and at the same time to provide feature parity security-wise. If people want the old version as it was, with the floating hovering menu and the "Allow / Temporarily allow / Forbid" commands (which, BTW, functionally map one-by-one with the new TRUSTED/UNTRUSTED paradigm), they can use Firefox 52 ESR or the Tor Browser as long as they're supported: on Firefox 57 this stuff is just out of reach for add-ons.
Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform) just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript can provide to people which actually rely on it, even for their physical safety (and no, uMatrix / uBlock / ScriptSafe & C. are not up to the task, simply because they've got a completely different scope).
2445 მიმოხილვა
- 5 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Rifat, 10 დღის წინ
- 5 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი noewaeda, 13 დღის წინit's an essential extension. without it, using the internet is like walking directly into a warzone.
on the strict setting, it makes browsing slightly more clunky due to having to give websites some trust, but it's usually not that big of a deal. - 5 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Max Rower, 13 დღის წინ
- 2 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი fidius, 14 დღის წინI uninstalled this extension because it randomly started interfering with browsing due to some nonsense swipe-style gesture 'feature'. Used to be a good extension but I'm not inclined to trust it anymore.
- 5 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 19773062, 14 დღის წინDue to a bug that effected mobile scrolling, I disabled Noscript for a day and discovered what a horrible experience browsing was without it.
It seems the bug is now fixed, and in record time too. Thanks Giorgio. Fantastic extension. - 5 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Tsuki, 14 დღის წინ
- 5 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი tt, 14 დღის წინNew update gesture feature needs to be removed. Disabling the extention until it's fixed
updating to 5 stars now that gesture feature is turned off by default - 1 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Kval, 15 დღის წინRemove gestures or add an option to disable this clunky gesture feature in the settings in the next update. Scrolling is impossible with the current update. For this reason alone, I'm removing this very useful extension for now, until they fix this annoying feature.
- 1 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Radosław, 15 დღის წინ
- 1 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი fcat435, 15 დღის წინHad to disable the extension because it prevented me from scrolling on pages.
- 2 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 12969656, 15 დღის წინDitch the gesture on mobile function and will be a 5* extension again.
- 3 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 13428877, 15 დღის წინI use it a lot and it has been a great tool but had to drop the rating after the new gesture system has been added since for a while I had no idea it had been added and it has made browsing a complete hell on mobile because it can't be disabled so I will have to disable the app until then.
- 2 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Vee, 15 დღის წინWas good, but the new gesture system is horrible and makes scrolling on mobile more trouble than it's worth.
This should have never been implemented silently in the background without an option to disable, to begin with. No idea what the dev was thinking.
Had to disable Noscript on mobile until it's fixed. - 5 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Ivan, 15 დღის წინThe whole gesture idea thing. First, accessing the settings in Firefox android is the same number of ui interactions once the new ui layout is learned. Second, Imagine if another extension did what you decided to do (the whole Old New Thing "Imagine if two programs did this"). Third, I cannot believe your awesome extension can still be Mozilla recommended after this. 🙁
- 1 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 18205130, 15 დღის წინNow, when I accidentally hold down on the screen, the selection randomly appears. It turns out this extension is to blame. How can I disable it? I can't find anything in the settings. Please give us the opportunity to remove this "gesture".
- 1 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 13994127, 15 დღის წინPlease let us scroll again. Thank you.
- 2 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 17307430, 15 დღის წინ
- 3 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Oi you, 15 დღის წინI'd rate this significantly higher, but 13.6.3 added some annoying gesture nonsense on mobile that's bloody inconvenient and doesn't have any obvious off switch.
- 1 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი xorek, 15 დღის წინWas great, but now there is an annoying gesture function I cannot disable. Trying to browse and a slight movement to the corners on the left will start drawing. I have a disability that causes finger twitching, so this idiotic feature constantly activates. New features should always default to off. Review from android phone. Edit: Downgraded to a previous version worked at least. Still keeping 1 star because of this stupid decision to not have a toggle. Way to not care about people with disabilities...
- 1 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 18210165, 15 დღის წინThis new gesture "feature" (more like a bug) really ruins things. Put it back how it was.
- 5 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 19770324, 15 დღის წინThank you for making the gestures optional again, this extension is back to being awesome!
- 5 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 14489384, 15 დღის წინ
- 2 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Speaka, 15 დღის წინThe new swipe gestures make it basically unusable. There is no way to disable this annoying bs
- 4 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი guppy, 15 დღის წინWorks great for what it intends to do. But i don't understand why it needs a swipe gesture that makes the logo show up and opens the extension menu if you drag it around enough. I uninstalled it because I kept doing it on accident and there isn't a way to turn this feature off.
- 1 შეფასება 5-დანმიმომხილველი Firefox-ის მომხმარებელი 14609268, თვის წინIf you use Firefox for any productivity, such as paying bills, you should NOT install this. It CONSTANTLY breaks third-party payment processor functionality with no warning and no clues only frustration making your safety worse than without it. While this is might be great for granular control, it is the OPPOSITE of its "with no loss of functionality" mission. This is the #1 go-to source of browser errors that I am constantly troubleshooting and it takes HOURS of time sifting unfamiliar site names to figure out what to tweak because it provides no help when it breaks something (like a search box)--you just have to go on a lengthy trial and error quest one by one to figure out which of 30 sites to trust to get a search bar working and by that time I don't remember what I was going to search for. So you end up just globally trusting everything and that defeats the whole purpose.