1 045 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur jay, pred 4 rokmiThe idea is great, but unfortunately it breaks some websites! This would not be so much of a problem if it had whitelisting functionality. For now there was no other option for me but to uninstall it again...
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Ulfric, pred 4 rokmiThis was a decent add-on that I forgot about and let run wild, but unfortunately the lack of a whitelist means I cannot get much use out of this anymore. For some reason it recently broke Pocket's inline articles, and I found out from the reviews that it breaks certain features in Gmail as well (which I didn't connect to this add-on until now!). Please add a whitelist, or at least more user flexibility in terms of maneuvering through features that may break important website features.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Case_Of, pred 4 rokmi
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Echonly, pred 4 rokmiI uninstalled this extension after using it for more than a day. The default rules have caused me a lot of trouble when browsing the web, and there is no way to set detailed settings.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur 22jjjnn, pred 4 rokmi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur SlyArcher, pred 4 rokmi
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 17394022, pred 4 rokmiThis ends up breaking several non tracking urls as they sometimes inject history state for functionality.
And the extension doesn't provide a single way to add exceptions and by viewing the github it seems they just plain ignore suggestions.
There is a setting called "The url to the data.json file (rules)" but this does nothing as changing it to several different things still worked in the exact same way.
If you don't use pages that may modify or rely on the url consistency is a great extension but besides that it missing a critical feature. - Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Frans, pred 4 rokmiThis was breaking links from loading, and since this is a "install and forget" type of extension--which is nice, except in this instance--and since there is no link whitelisting, I unfortunately have to disable it. :(
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur aconamos, pred 4 rokmiThis extension works great other than that it has completely broken google OAuth for me. I have had to disable it which sucks because I really like this extension.
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Midnight1, pred 4 rokmiThis add on is bugging as hell, blocks some web sites from loading.
Took me a week to figure out what the problem was.
Disable it and all is well.
I uninstalled it!! - Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Mister GothFvck, pred 4 rokmi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Soulsurfer, pred 4 rokmiein äußerst nützliches Add-on, arbeitet unauffällig im Hintergrund und erledigt genau das, was die Entwickler versprechen!
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14108734, pred 4 rokmiNeed the ability to WHITELIST certain URLS. It is either on, or off. And when it breaks a website, I have to turn it off completely. Add this please!
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Arash Yoosefdoost, pred 4 rokmiThe new version causes many problems. For example, it broke Firefox's back and forward buttons in Gmail. Makes Gmail's unique email links invalid and the page will be redirected to the inbox in case of refreshing. It is a new problem.
In addition, it broke many websites such as banks. Also, prevent plugins such as Boomerang to connect to the Gmail account and broke them.
It was a good Firefox add-on but now cases many serious issues. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur WildSnakeNYC, pred 4 rokmi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur moneywiseUpfront, pred 4 rokmiIf Google removed the extension from the Chrome Web Store... Then ClearURLs does its job well.
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13938515, pred 4 rokmiSome URLs doesn't work with last release 1.24.1 when they worked with previous release. Must deactivate ClearURLs to access these URLs. Not terrific.
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Dareal Bingoxz, pred 4 rokmi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur tonini, pred 4 rokmi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aly, pred 4 rokmi
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13202285, pred 4 rokmiGreat extension, but it needs a whitelist. Payment portals are sometimes broken.
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Adolf.Markl@gmx.de, pred 4 rokmiWas ist mit "fbclid=" + "gclid=" ?
Vorschlag: einzeln An/Aus für jede Klasse dieser Tracks (utm_.*, fbcl.*=, gclid=, ...)?
außerdem: Whitelist wäre wünschenswert.