Iceggiren i NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite sɣur Giorgio Maone
Icegger-it Aseqdac Firefox 13504819
Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5
sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13504819, il y a 8 ansFirst of all thank you for all the effort you put into the new Quantum-enabled version of NoScript. I can imagine, it took a lot of time to rewrite this extension, which had been developed for years, completely from scratch.
It is noticable that the new version has been written in a big hurry. The UI is not fully developed and looks like it was made for newbies than for experienced computer users. I know, the UI cannot be changed back. We all will have to accept that XUL is gone. I don't think, the new UI is bad in general. It is just not finished yet.
Sadly, some very important features are still missing. For me personally, giving temporary permissions to a website is a must-have feature. I think this is such a key component that I wonder why it has not been implemented yet. How am I supposed to test a website? Giving it permanent permissions and later revoking them again is not a very effective way.
There are still a lot of things to be done. However, I think a huge step was made already. The basic functionality is now implemented as a WebExtension with more functionality to follow. Keep up the good work. I am sure, the comments and ratings of NoScript will become better soon.
It is noticable that the new version has been written in a big hurry. The UI is not fully developed and looks like it was made for newbies than for experienced computer users. I know, the UI cannot be changed back. We all will have to accept that XUL is gone. I don't think, the new UI is bad in general. It is just not finished yet.
Sadly, some very important features are still missing. For me personally, giving temporary permissions to a website is a must-have feature. I think this is such a key component that I wonder why it has not been implemented yet. How am I supposed to test a website? Giving it permanent permissions and later revoking them again is not a very effective way.
There are still a lot of things to be done. However, I think a huge step was made already. The basic functionality is now implemented as a WebExtension with more functionality to follow. Keep up the good work. I am sure, the comments and ratings of NoScript will become better soon.
2 422 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14609268, il y a 6 joursWhile this is an incredibly great app for granular control, it is the OPPOSITE of its "with no loss of functionality" mission. This is the #1 go-to source of browser errors that I am constantly troubleshooting and it takes HOURS of time sifting to figure out what to tweak because it provides no help when it breaks something (like a search box)--you just have to go on a lengthy trial and error quest one by one to figure out which of 30 sites to trust to get a search bar working and by that time I don't remember what I was going to search for. So you end up just globally trusting everything and that defeats the whole purpose.
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13935566, il y a 15 jours
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Pompan, il y a 17 jours
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Beauleau, il y a un mois
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Maximilien Perron, il y a un mois
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18127040, il y a un moisТакие прям зайки и лапочки... Разместить закрытие окна приветствия и "Пожертвовать" чуть ли не с наложением друг на друга. Эдакое "Ну, даааааайти деняяяяяях!". Звезда в минус.
Аддон классный, но не нужно быть, как эти. - Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur MinorityMaid, il y a un moisIt's extremely useful, but not exactly intuitive.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Sunny, il y a un mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19664008, il y a 2 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19487299, il y a 2 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Ryan Steed, il y a 2 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur ZeroUnderscoreOu, il y a 2 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Dzluck, il y a 3 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Bob, il y a 3 mois
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur mlatpren, il y a 3 moisIt does a great job at blocking, but is regularly frustrating with re-enabling things. It's supposed to show you what it's blocking, but that's extremely hit-or-miss. Occasionally, there'd be something blocked where the only solution is to disable the extension. As in, right-click and disable *from Firefox itself.*
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur zekromVale, il y a 3 moisThere needs to be a CPU limit on this extension, using 30% CPU of an intel i7 11th gen laptop CPU on YouTube is ridiculous. Firefox for Ubuntu snap, flatpack, or just .deb are affected. Must disable NoScript to fix it or allow everything fully for all domains on the page. I would like more domains to be added to the global trusted list though (by default) or have a popup at the top when you first visit a page.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Hopeavirta, il y a 3 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Lazy Cat, il y a 3 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur sumobunny, il y a 3 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Zelgadis-San, il y a 3 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Dadou, il y a 4 mois
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur aq, il y a 4 moisUser for at least 15 years, Something is conflicting on Firefox. It is blocking scripts and other add ons such as tampermonkey or violentmonkey with scripts added, but without any listing of what is being blocked. Only option is to shut it off to proceed.
Even blocking games internal scripts without any 'monkey' in use.
Please check and test - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Simon Bünemann, il y a 4 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur ADKFZ8O, il y a 4 mois
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Marw, il y a 4 mois