Iceggiren i NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite sɣur Giorgio Maone
2 468 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur asmwarrior, 8 anni fa
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14083114, 8 anni fathank you ! very useful and must-have extension for max security
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14325950, 8 anni faI have been a continuous user for more than 8 years. Initially I needed security support when accessing financial data on the web. More recently I have referred to and taken action from NoScript warnings when visiting a much wider range of sites. NoScript has never let me down!
Thanks must go to Giorgio and his team for his impressive app. Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 8 anni faJust FYI: "unlimited storage" permission is needed by NoScript in order to persist your settings, and more specifically your permissions list which may become very large. Anyway, the full source code repository (with all the changes history) is available here: https://github.com/hackademix/noscript
Hope it helps you stop conjuring theories about the intentions of this extensions.- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur digitalcircuit, 8 anni fa
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 8 anni faCouldy ou please report with more details here? Thanks! https://noscript.net/forum- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur George Thomas, 8 anni faOne of those "must-have" add-ons. You really need this even if you think you don't
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14114271, 8 anni fa
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 12950286, 8 anni fa
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14298576, 8 anni faFirst off, I've used NoScript for a number of years and have donated and am hovering between 2-3 stars due to the terrible UI.
Unfortunately the UI remains extremely poor, with confusing wording and very bad icon designs (w.r.t usability, nevermind esthetics). The UI uses double negatives, which is bad (ref: MS and Apple). This may be a side effect of Italian translation.
There is not differentiation with colour: blue and red are used in the icons regardless if something is "safe" or "unsafe". The exclamation mark doesn't work that well for conveying meaning (it's "sort of" a warning, but then the "stop sign" is also used - but now the stop sign means, "stop restricting" (again - double negative))
E.g.
S!: disable restrictions (change icon. to, almost anything, change wording to: "Allow everything (including blocked scripts)")
!: disable restrictions for this tab (change icon to almost anything else, change wording to: "Allow everything on this tab. (Maintain restrictions on blocked domains)")
Clock!: Set all to temporarily trusted (change icon, "Temporarily Trust everything on this tab. (Maintain restrictions on blocked domains)" )
Clock + Stop symbol: revoke temporary permissions (change icon, wording to "Normal operation"?) - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14292288, 8 anni fa
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14250674, 8 anni fa
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14290478, 8 anni faModule efficace et indispensable avec une interface très intuitive et esthétique depuis Firefox Quantum.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14287774, 8 anni fa
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14284504, 8 anni fa
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14283637, 8 anni fa
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Jimmy Montano, 8 anni fa
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 8 anni faThe "privileged pages" are those which WebExtensions cannot have access to, i.e. a bunch of about:xyz pages, plus the domains listed in this about:config preference:
extensions.webextensions.restrictedDomains
Anyway using this as a discussion forum is not a good idea. Please report your reset issue (and bring other discussions, if any) at https://noscript.net/forum, thank you!