Iceggiren i SingleFile
SingleFile sɣur gildas
1 027 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13048311, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Radu Bogoevici, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Cormchij, לפני 6 שניםTried a lot of extensions. Your best. But it cuts the length of the file name by 140 characters. This is inconvenient. Can I remove this restriction?
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg לפני 6 שניםThank you. You can update the hidden option "filenameMaxLength" for that. See https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/wiki/Hidden-options for more info about how to change hidden options. Feel free to contact me if you need help. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur dinor studio, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur NocedaCloud, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Marce, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Wo, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur fuzzydorito, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur JavirtanLabs, לפני 6 שניםI used to love the MAFF file format old add-on. I've been missing it till now. Your add-on works pretty well for me. The extra feature for editing (like highlighting) is way too cool. Thanks a lot!
My only question is, how much is this one better than SingleFileZ? I'm curious about that, I mean, why should I use SingleFile instead of SingleFileZ?
EDIT March/11/2020:
The Developer response to my question was pretty clear. Now I understand the differences very well. Thanks a lot for your answer and awesome work!Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg לפני 6 שניםThank you for the review. I would say that the main advantage of SingleFile over SingleFileZ is that pages saved with SingleFile do not require JavaScript to be enabled in order to be displayed. In other words, if you want to save your pages as "pure" HTML files, use SingleFile. If you prefer to save them as zip files disguised as HTML pages, use SingleFileZ.
Note that SingleFile allows you to edit the page with the editor you refer to (I'm glad you like it). SingleFileZ cannot do this because it is more complicated to implement.
EDIT: Thank you! - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13870051, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur triantafillia, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur 茶几上的猫, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Cherwally, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Arioh, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14738141, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Idan Nabara, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur i18n, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Marieli, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Abe, לפני 6 שניםMake sure to enable this for JavaScript (https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq.md#why-dont-interactive-elements-like-folding-titles-dynamic-maps-or-carousels-work-properly-in-saved-pages).
Works great! However, I really feel like saving scripts, audio elements, etc. should be enabled by default.Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg לפני 6 שניםThank you for the review. The default settings are optimized to produce light (and faithful) snapshot of pages because this was the most recurrent complain in the past. That's why the options you mentioned are disabled. Note also that disabling the option "remove scripts" can, unfortunately, lead to corrupted pages. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 15695469, לפני 6 שנים
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur chris-vecchio, לפני 6 שנים