Iceggiren i CleanLinks
CleanLinks sγur Cimbali
Icegger-it jawz101
Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5
sɣur jawz101, prije 2 godineAfter a decade of this add-onb it praise because it is very powerful, I have decided to drop it back down to how I really feel. I hate it. I know it is powerful but I've never understood how to use its rule engine nor understand the concepts.
It is powerful and does something but it's not quite clear. I think it can use several techniques to control what urls do but none of them make sense and I don't know who does know. The UI speaks volumes about its unintuitive.purpose
I wish it at least did not do what other, more popular add-ons do so I can see what value it offers over other add-ons. Otherwise, I don't see it getting any traction
It is powerful and does something but it's not quite clear. I think it can use several techniques to control what urls do but none of them make sense and I don't know who does know. The UI speaks volumes about its unintuitive.purpose
I wish it at least did not do what other, more popular add-ons do so I can see what value it offers over other add-ons. Otherwise, I don't see it getting any traction
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije 2 godineSorry to see you go jawz and thanks for all the feedback you’ve given over the years.
The thing this add-on does and others don’t is simply auto-detect embedded URLs. This also causes many breakages and means the ruleset has to be whitelisting instead of when & how to clean links…
I’m sure the UI and many other things can be improved, but I have limited time on my hands, Also any suggestions on improvements of the UI or anything else are always welcome.
The thing this add-on does and others don’t is simply auto-detect embedded URLs. This also causes many breakages and means the ruleset has to be whitelisting instead of when & how to clean links…
I’m sure the UI and many other things can be improved, but I have limited time on my hands, Also any suggestions on improvements of the UI or anything else are always welcome.
35 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur مـوفـتـاكـيـس, prije 2 mjeseca
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Сырное, prije godinu
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur AvHmT, prije 2 godineI know this plugin from the FF28 period, it has been improved since then, the interface is perfectly scalable, it works flawlessly. Awesome work, thank you very so much.
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Minneyar, prije 2 godineI really like the concept of this add-on, and when it works it's great, but it breaks so many web sites. Common things like clicking on links in Tweetdeck or logging in to PayPal simply don't work unless you open up the add-on's settings and start manually whitelisting sites, and the add-on's interface is unintuitive enough to me that I feel like I'm solving a puzzle every time I use it.
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Quinn, prije 4 godineOverall, the best link-cleaning addon by far. The only issue I have had is with Amazon, which can be fixed (with slightly reduced functionality) by unchecking "Match subdomains" in the rule for Amazon.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur crump el, prije 5 godinagenerally great experience.. but BREAKS shopping on amazon: multi item selectors arent actually selecting preventing adding to cart. problems with any item requiring user choices. items without choices can add to cart
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 15905022, prije 5 godina
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Max, prije 5 godinaGood work! Please add the following rule to your default list, it will help to watch facebook photos on mobile devices normally:
domain: m.facebook.com
path: /photo*
whitelist: fbid refid - Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Diod, prije 5 godina
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Doug, prije 5 godinaAfter just a little testing, this is the best link cleaner I've tried.
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur peterfnet, prije 5 godinaBreaks sites like fakespot.com. As soon as I disable it, site works again.
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije 5 godinaAs explained in its description, the extension blocks all links that contain hidden URLs inside them. You can then whitelist manually which use cases seem reasonable to you from the add-on’s popup menu. - Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14043159, prije 5 godinaAndroid version doesn't work for my Android Firefox.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 15109409, prije 6 godina
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur AbdAbd10, prije 6 godina
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14773836, prije 6 godinait makes control click open link in current tab instead of a new tab
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije 6 godinaHi @user 14773836, and thanks for your feedback. Currently control click works fine for me. If you could come over to https://github.com/Cimbali/CleanLinks/issues/ to report your setup (OS, Firefox version, etc.) and an example of a link on which this happens, then I could have a look at fixing it for you too! - Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14702040, prije 6 godinaBroke images loading in Gmail emails and Hangouts. Took me a long time to finally figure out it was this extension.
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije 6 godinaHi @user14702040, sometimes you can be tracked by images, and when that is automatically detected the add-on blocks them.
Fortunately you can easily whitelist per domain by clicking the add-on icon, selecting the offending link, and click "Whitelist Selection."
You can also choose to have the application only clean links that you clean, not other resources loaded, by unticking "Clean outgoing HTTP Requests" in the add-on preferences. - Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Black🏴☠️Sails, prije 6 godina
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur peekaa, prije 6 godinaCould it work even with facebook events, to remove all the stuff after the events/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx? Thank you.
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur jupiter2, prije 6 godinaUpdate: Thanks for the response. Really like the fact that the project is active. Will remove an alternate cleaner I started to use (it just does google cleanups) and will reinstall this. Will fully test for a couple of days and provide better feedback, if any (on github).
----
Cleaned links on google w/o issue.
Massive failure on RSS reader (The Old Reader): "414 Request-URI Too Large". When I copied the resulting url, it was the original URL repeating itself, ad-infinitum. It happened when accessing theregister.co.uk/2019/01/26/apples_swift_patents/ but worked fine on other links.
This review based on extension version 3.2.1 (Oct 18, 2018).Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije 6 godinaHi and thanks for using Clean Links! When encountering a bug, you can report it on https://github.com/Cimbali/CleanLinks/issues with the original link that loads incorrectly, so that I can find out what went wrong and fix it.
The bug causing "Request URI Too Large" has been fixed in version 3.2.4 - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur F.Z., prije 6 godinaThis is a great handy add-on! Could you have an option to let user convert obfuscated link in Location bar only?
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije 6 godinaHi, I'm not sure what you mean. We un-obfuscate links when they are clicked and when they are loaded, but none of those are really aware of the location bar. If you open an issue on https://github.com/Cimbali/CleanLinks/issues we can discuss it and I'll look into it. - Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Nigirimeshi, prije 7 godinaI needed to add 'mail.google.com' into 'Skip Domais' in order to connect with the Gmail.
I wasted time.Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije 6 godinaHi and thanks for using Clean Links! As it stands there is a bit of a learning curve with Clean Links where everyone builds up their whitelist. I'm looking to get a centralized set of rules while still allowing customization, which isn't easy -- but I'm working on it. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur fushigi-kun, prije 7 godinaI missed Clean Links. It is the best add-on in its class out of all the ones I have tried.
Recommendable.