Iceggiren i IPvFoo
IPvFoo sɣur Paul Marks
Icegger-it Aseqdac Firefox 14049879
Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5
sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14049879, 7 jierren lynDoes not work on my system: In the column where the ip should appear, there it says only "access denied".
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
IPvFox instead works perfectly and does exactly the same.
My system is a windows 10 Home with heavily restricted user rights and a whitelisting firewall (instead of the default blacklisting). Maybe some of those security measures hinder IPvFoo while do no harm to IPvFox. It would be interesting to learn what exactly is it that IPvFoo wants to do violating those security measures.
40 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur vertigont17, 3 moannen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Wolf786, 3 moannen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Tempdirz, 5 moannen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 17087931, ien jier lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18373085, 2 jierren lynexactly what I was looking for... Thanks!
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur tux, 2 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Tim, 2 jierren lynFor those worried about "Access your data for all websites", this is an unavoidable problem with addon permission scopes. Put by the purported (likely?) author on a forum:
> IPvFoo author here. The problem is that there's no way to obtain the (hostname, ip) stream from Chrome/Firefox without requesting the "all websites" permission.
> In theory, browser vendors could define a narrowly-scoped permission that only reports (hostname, ip), or roll this functionality into the browser UI, but neither seems likely to happen.
> I made IPvFoo to promote IPv6 adoption, and wouldn't consider selling it for less than $10M USD. It probably won't ever be worth that much because it's an easily-cloned utility without a "moat", but it's more rational to set a price than refuse to sell under any circumstances.
The addon is open source, and if you insisted, could be built/installed manually. However, I trust it for now from here on AMO.
UPDATE: Thanks for confirming, Paul!Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 2 jierren lyn> purported (likely?) author
Yes, that was me (p1mrx on HN) - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Sharky, 2 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur 葉稔, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Baptiste, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Caliban, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Rodolfo R@mírez..., 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur gomers., 4 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 16855318, 4 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur takeshi0303, 4 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13845156, 4 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 16393218, 4 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Abdul Rauf, 5 jierren lynThis should be the recommended extension by firefox. Source code is available at https://github.com/pmarks-net/ipvfoo so I think this can be trusted after review
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur somnitek, 5 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur hbermon, 5 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Marcone C.A, 6 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur 章灵北, 6 jierren lynThanks！a VERY perfect extension to view whether the website give priority to IPV6.