Iceggiren i Firefox Multi-Account Containers
Firefox Multi-Account Containers sɣur Firefox
Icegger-it Sandaruwan
7 882 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 15358174, 3 ore în urmăThe click target for Container management could be a tad larger for repeatable precision, Otherwise works as described. Android Implementation is much appreciated.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Steve, 7 ore în urmăI just love what this extension does, preventing cross-talk between activated Container tabs! There is one, rather large, caveat, however, in that when initially setting up a URL in a designated Container, it easily completed, and it looks like you're done! BUT... the next time you use that URL (say you Bookmarked it), you are presented with a Container verification screen, where you have to say, "Yes, I actually DO WANT to use the Container that I thought that I already HAD set up!" What this means is that once you setup a URL to a Container, you have to immediately TRY that URL (possibly Bookmarked) to answer that verification page. THEN...everything works as expected. I consider it an inconvenience, but once you are used to jumping thru the hoops, its 2nd nature. And that does not detract from the purpose or function of the extension!
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14991062, o zi în urmăWorks well for my use (on a single machine). I haven't used the sync-option! Other reviews report it is buggy...
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 15356034, o zi în urmă
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur fabioescolastico, 2 zile în urmăAjuda muito quem precisa acessar vários de logins diferentes, mas a sincronia tem problemas.
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur majesticmini, 7 zile în urmăIt was miraculous to use, but Mozilla does not care to develop or run anything without illegal corporations telling them what to do. Who agrees? Is the Internet not a conspiracy?
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13835821, 8 zile în urmăIrresponsible to have this extension published and available with such dire bugs. Whatever you do, DO NOT turn on Sync for this extension. You'll end up wiping out your entire configuration, your containers, your site rules, everything.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur DDB, 9 zile în urmă
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14515734, 9 zile în urmă
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur KurChr, 10 zile în urmăNeeded to have multiple Web Outlook email accounts open simultaneously. Worked great. If pinned the accounts came back up without logging in again if Firefox exited and restarted. Would be absolutely perfect for me if the accounts came back up after a Restart.
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Randomfox, 11 zile în urmăDoesn't work well containing Google, can't sign in on gemini.google.com
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19625591, 11 zile în urmă
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur 0x666c697473, 13 zile în urmăGuaranteed to silently drop containers in the middle of your workflow, with no github interest in even acknowledging the problem.
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur spindog, 14 zile în urmăsyncing is pointless. i'm done setting up site lists every time it resets when logging in on new devices.
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Davide, 14 zile în urmăThe Firefox Sync integration is horrible - it keeps merging back old changes. Container settings get reverted, and old removed containers come back...
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Sean Critz, 15 zile în urmăThis extension needs some work before it fits the concept. In situations where multiple accounts need to be managed on the same website (using multiple microsoft accounts for different clients, for instance) , it is generally not usable. The following workflow breaks it:
- Open tab in X container, login to a service
- Service uses redirects to authenticate, container extension grabs those redirects and loses the container status or changes the container status, breaking the login flow or putting a different login into the context
Additionally, there does not seem to be an option to remove a site from a container preference, once added. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur René, 15 zile în urmăDe ideale manier om met meerdere accounts en een domein te werken zonder van profiel te hoeven wisselen.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Steve S, 17 zile în urmă
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14376762, 18 zile în urmăWorks well for seperating my tracked internet history, without needing to setup a second Firefox Profile & Mozilla Account. This in addition to the Facebook, Google & Twitter Containers help keep those 3 from tying everywhere I go on the 'net to my accounts.
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13252902, 22 de zile în urmăReally helps at keeping some of the problematic sites contained. Could use some polishing but very useful addition.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur fazlan, 22 de zile în următhis is the god extension for me. my life saver please continue. dont stop ever. i love you firefox
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Mackintosh´s, 23 de zile în urmăPlease change environment bonds to Deep Links instead of only Top Level Domains. Ask whether the container should always open up when the current deep link is opened or whenever any site of the top level domain is opened.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Dan, 25 de zile în urmă
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur ChosenFate, o lună în urmăThis is great in concept, however, the friction kills it for me. After adding a site to a container, whenever I now open a link of that site, I get asked whether I wanna open it in that container. Of course I do, I mean, I manually added it to that container. This only needs to be done once per site, but it's still unnecessary friction that just about tips it over to "more pain than gain" unfortunately. Please make an option to always open a given site in it's container no matter what