Iceggiren i Firefox Multi-Account Containers
Firefox Multi-Account Containers sɣur Firefox
Icegger-it BL
Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5
sɣur BL, 3 წლის წინ(Double edit: thought I was writing a redundant review but it turns out listing ones reviews in ones profile it doesn't tell you WHAT the review is of...HOWEVER, getting to "CONTAINERS IN FIREFOX..."
TL; DR version:
Like:
Moderately highly recommend as a "why not should help not hurt" additional layer of privacy defense, and has features that become semi-automated so it can be integrated into your workflow without much effort.
Would like if:
I'd like a little more customization (UI) and as a non-tech person (I only know a couple things) I would like to underrstand more of the "UX" lol, but while no one is perfect, this extension (literally) of a "non-profit seems like a no brainer though unclear how MUCH it helps it's easy to use.
The TL;DR "more"
Seems to do what it says it will do (in the background) well, and/or perhaps it's simply extra layer of defense I think at minimum? One thing I don't like is not being able to change the primary categories...you can add additional containers naming them anything you want, and I HAVE done that for a couple. They limit the number of symbols and colors you can use for each container which is only slightly annoying ;-) I LOVE how I set it to "open new tabs in a container" and it brings it up and you choose so don't forget, and how it automatically opens different web sites in the asssigned container (it asks you "always open in this container?" which is also a nice workflow/don't have to remember thing. These days things are so complicated that between the native browser protections, additional settings, add ons like this, etc, it can be very difficult to figure out if something doesn't work on a website where the problem is. That seems to be a rare problem though and I've worked around it and don't know that ANY were from this extension. The click symbol to change to a container is also eay to use/find. This seemed like a "no brainer" especially with the objects-in-libraries-associated-with-appearance-of-person-company company who along with those that had one strange rule and couldn't keep it strangely which has many services including finding things on the web, the container thingee is relatively simple and seems to work well not that I can tell what's going on under the hood but file under "probalby helps; doesn't seem to hurt or if does hurt not much at all!"
TL; DR version:
Like:
Moderately highly recommend as a "why not should help not hurt" additional layer of privacy defense, and has features that become semi-automated so it can be integrated into your workflow without much effort.
Would like if:
I'd like a little more customization (UI) and as a non-tech person (I only know a couple things) I would like to underrstand more of the "UX" lol, but while no one is perfect, this extension (literally) of a "non-profit seems like a no brainer though unclear how MUCH it helps it's easy to use.
The TL;DR "more"
Seems to do what it says it will do (in the background) well, and/or perhaps it's simply extra layer of defense I think at minimum? One thing I don't like is not being able to change the primary categories...you can add additional containers naming them anything you want, and I HAVE done that for a couple. They limit the number of symbols and colors you can use for each container which is only slightly annoying ;-) I LOVE how I set it to "open new tabs in a container" and it brings it up and you choose so don't forget, and how it automatically opens different web sites in the asssigned container (it asks you "always open in this container?" which is also a nice workflow/don't have to remember thing. These days things are so complicated that between the native browser protections, additional settings, add ons like this, etc, it can be very difficult to figure out if something doesn't work on a website where the problem is. That seems to be a rare problem though and I've worked around it and don't know that ANY were from this extension. The click symbol to change to a container is also eay to use/find. This seemed like a "no brainer" especially with the objects-in-libraries-associated-with-appearance-of-person-company company who along with those that had one strange rule and couldn't keep it strangely which has many services including finding things on the web, the container thingee is relatively simple and seems to work well not that I can tell what's going on under the hood but file under "probalby helps; doesn't seem to hurt or if does hurt not much at all!"
7 868 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13252902, დღის წინReally helps at keeping some of the problematic sites contained. Could use some polishing but very useful addition.
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Mackintosh´s, 2 დღის წინPlease change environment bonds to Deep Links instead of only Top Level Domains. Ask whether the container should always open up when the current deep link is opened or whenever any site of the top level domain is opened.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Dan, 4 დღის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur ChosenFate, 5 დღის წინThis is great in concept, however, the friction kills it for me. After adding a site to a container, whenever I now open a link of that site, I get asked whether I wanna open it in that container. Of course I do, I mean, I manually added it to that container. This only needs to be done once per site, but it's still unnecessary friction that just about tips it over to "more pain than gain" unfortunately. Please make an option to always open a given site in it's container no matter what
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Chinmay Rajyaguru, 6 დღის წინThis is very powerful tool for productivity. I shifted from Chrome to Firefox a week ago.
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur thomasa88, 10 დღის წინThis add-on works very well and I use it every day!
However, there are some things that I think could be improved:
First, when opening a webpage that has a container assigned, I get the choice between "open in current" tab and "open in x container". I would like to be able to select from all my containers directly on that page.
Second, when reopening Firefox, all tabs that get reloaded when clicking on them triggers the "choose container" page.
Also, choosing the option to not open a new tab for container pages led to some weird tab interactions, but I can't remember exactly what happened. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Rawe, 11 დღის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 12912919, 14 დღის წინNão é gratuito. Tem que pagar e instalar o VPN para windows. Ridiculo, só avisam que é pago depois que instalar o ADDON.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Naveen Kumar, 18 დღის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur IntensiveExtensions, 18 დღის წინPlease make this feature available on Android. This extension is useful!
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19625821, 19 დღის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur ZeroUnderscoreOu, 20 დღის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13569081, 20 დღის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19623393, 21 დღის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Alfred, 22 დღის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur oprypin, 24 დღის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13299940, 25 დღის წინDoesn't auto select the appropriate tab. Requires other extensions for that behavior.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19611976, თვის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19611096, თვის წინIt is a must have extension. I primary use it during development where I need different states of cookies and logins.
The only thing I'm missing is to be able to open a URL in a specific container e.g. by specifying a protocol prefix in a href (or whatever data-x-target="{container name}").
I can not assign a full domain as I need to view the same domain in different configurations, but I'd like to access them by just clicking on my "bookmark" link - My site (Beta-2), My site (Alpha).. etc... - Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur gcharikiopoulos, თვის წინ
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18047496, თვის წინ