Iceggiren i NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite sɣur Giorgio Maone
Icegger-it ankspo71
Review for noscript 10.1.3c1
After fiddling with noscript for a while, I see that noscipt is working for me , and I am beginning to like the new UI, but there are some issues with unexpected behavior.
For instance, if I create a rule to allow an insecure connection to wired.com, and then reload the page, my selection will seem to disappear (or revert), but in reality my selection is not shown because there is no insecure connection to wired.com so the site remains blocked. It is unexpected to see the rule disappear and block the page and might cause people to think it doesn't work. I also assumed that my insecure rule would automatically allow a secure connection. EDIT: This problem has been fixed with a recent update. Thanks
Also a smaller issue is globally allowing scripts only shows top level domain allowed, instead of showing all allowed domains, similar to how "temporary allow all this page" shows all domains.
Overall I think Giorgio has done good work so far at rewriting noscript, but I think it needs a little more polishing.
After fiddling with noscript for a while, I see that noscipt is working for me , and I am beginning to like the new UI, but there are some issues with unexpected behavior.
For instance, if I create a rule to allow an insecure connection to wired.com, and then reload the page, my selection will seem to disappear (or revert), but in reality my selection is not shown because there is no insecure connection to wired.com so the site remains blocked. It is unexpected to see the rule disappear and block the page and might cause people to think it doesn't work. I also assumed that my insecure rule would automatically allow a secure connection. EDIT: This problem has been fixed with a recent update. Thanks
Also a smaller issue is globally allowing scripts only shows top level domain allowed, instead of showing all allowed domains, similar to how "temporary allow all this page" shows all domains.
Overall I think Giorgio has done good work so far at rewriting noscript, but I think it needs a little more polishing.
2 371 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14468519, 41 perce
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur rabbitshee, 2 napja
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19047433, 4 napja
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur A. Bilmanda, 6 napja
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Lazer Bear, 7 napja
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 15056996, 25 napjaissues with outdoorline.sk ; I have to stop Noscrypt to proceed with Payment gateway GP webpay
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur 镂心鉥肝, egy hónapjaNoScript还是很好的，不管是界面还是解释如何使用都进行了改进。不过，文章内容应该更加简洁一点。告诉用户每一个功能开关的意思。同时NoScript默认会阻止扩展脚本
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 17847461, egy hónapja
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18989716, egy hónapja
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Max, egy hónapjaI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur LittleFire, egy hónapja
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Absinthe, egy hónapja
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur thofree, egy hónapjaGets detected by Youtube's anti ad-block stuff. Wish you had a button to turn it off easily for a website without disabling it entirely.
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18920843, egy hónapja
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18315395, 2 hónapja
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Retromania, 2 hónapja
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Luciano Rangel, 2 hónapja
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18924473, 2 hónapja