Iceggiren i NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite sɣur Giorgio Maone
2 411 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Maxim, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 17623607, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Griboedovv, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur BPCo, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur shrl, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 17605478, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 6762984, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14058093, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Primorska Skupnost, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur WOANS, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur JolanXBL, 3 jierren lynMy Goto tool for testing a questionable website or link. Only issue is that NoScript doesn't tell you which script needs to be activated to show that 1 image, like when it shows 40+ things and none of the site images are loading...
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur hunsai, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Lùmi, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 17586528, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 17380333, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Trinutown, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Snake, 3 jierren lynSTILL BROKEN. Have same issue on multiple computers - NS fails to display all blocked elements meaning that you can't UNBLOCK them, meaning that pages won't render. Developer passes buck, denying issue. Again, same experience on MULTIPLE computers for a LONG time now, ever since FF's design requirements mod.
-----------------------------------------
Has been broken for a LONG time, pretty much since the new FF add-on design requirements. I use it on 2 different Win10 computers, both running the most up-to-date version of FF and NS (now FF 105 and NS 11.4.11) and both computers have the same issues: on many websites NS fails to show the correct number of scripts being blocked. This means that you can't *unblock* them, because they never show up on the list. You hit the 'Temp Allow All' button and NS shows a number still blocked, say 4, but the list does not actually show the 4 still blocked. This means that many websites are unusable because NS keeps some / many of the blocks off the list and you can't override that unless you Disable Restrictions Globally, and even then sometimes it doesn't work (see https://www.rideapart.com/news/609878/moto-guzzi-v100-mandello-pricing/ as a test).
Never has been fixed, for many months now. Seemed to have actually gotten worse these past 2 months, many websites aren't usable now.Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 3 jierren lynNot a NoScript problem: on that site I had to
1. Set googletagmanager.com to TRUSTED, probably because they use gtag to load most of their further (many) JavaScript dependencies
2. Disable uBlock for the page, otherwise some essential scripts could not be loaded or even shown because were preemptively filtered by uBlock.
If you've got other situations like this please try disabling other extensions (such as uBlock) and report in the proper bug tracker, thanks: https://github.com/hackademix/noscript/issues/ - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur fabestah, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14347140, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Link Safe, 3 jierren lynThis is the best extension I've tested so far!
Works as expected, and blocks EVERYTHING
you tell it to block! I recommend it to everyone! - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Zodd, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Eliot Cole, 3 jierren lynI use this in my private life *extensively* here I'll be trying to ensure that I can apply a tool like this to work seamlessly in a work context without too much overhead in times of being a time-sink.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur felix, 3 jierren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Billbo, 3 jierren lynI've been using this for years to block JavaScript from random third-party sites. It can be a bit tedious at times to enable enough sites to make things work, but well worth the effort to improve long-term performance and possibly security.