Iceggiren i NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite sɣur Giorgio Maone
2 454 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Azarilh, hace 8 añosWhoa, this new version is great! Jus' like 2 girls 1 cup!
PS: Why NoScript need to read the download history now? LOL
———
EDIT: Ok, that's fine. Thank you for the reply. Still, the new version is unfriendly, like others say too.
———
EDIT after 2 years i tried it again: UI still sucks, my rating remains 2/5. Too bad.Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg hace 8 añosUnlike "legacy" add-ons, WebExtensions cannot interact with your filesystem directly. The restored "Export" feature actually goes through the browser.downloads API to let you save your configuration locally. - Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur GiacomoGo, hace 8 añosMain good news continues with 10.1.6.1.
So happy with this fast progress!
• Added "Reset to defaults" button and "Temporarily set top-level sites to TRUSTED" option.
• 10.1.6.1 now seems to handle XSS much better, and recalls my settings.
This is precisely what has been missing. Visual ability to switch between sites from temp to permanent and back again is perfect.
Great progress, glad to NoScript back on track with this pure Webextension for Firefox Quantum. - Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13515039, hace 8 añosIn its current state, it is barely serviceable. It is still better than nothing, I know, because when I disabled it I started getting hijacked by rogue webpage scripts again. But it has alot of catching up to do to be as pleasing as the pre-Quantum version.
That annoying, user unfriendly popup window really has to go. The previous version had a more discreet and tolerable messaging UI at the bottom of the screen. Now it is in popup window format at the top of the page, in your face to annoy you very quickly.
And a suggestion of a much needed feature. An option dedicated to automatically allowing Facebook scripts. Since nearly every website now days has scripts for Facebook, it is getting tiresome to have to allow Facebook with nearly every website I visit. - Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13580736, hace 8 añosMolt bona. Imprescindible. No li dono 5 estrelles per què la corva d'aprenentatge és costeruda.
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 12955352, hace 8 añosCrashes Firefox and interface is way worse.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur AslanCSLewis, hace 8 añosExcellent extension! The new version is receiving too much criticism. It takes but a short time to figure out the functionality of the new version. It is also a work in progress with some of the features missing from the previous version still to come. The developer deserves credit for revamping this in a relatively timely manner in order to comply with the new requirements under Firefox Quantum.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13579587, hace 8 añosa MUST for everyone.... simply the BEST addon that has been developed for firefox
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13503786, hace 8 añosGreat improvements from first new webextensions version. Good job. Keep on.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur e-raser, hace 8 añosAfter a few starting issues (whitelisted sites weren´t saved permanently, the migration didn´t work so I started with default sites on v10 @ Firefox 57) I had some mail exchange with the developer. He responded quite fast and had the right answers. He also implemented a feature request for the debug window within 1 or 2 hours which fixed my problems totally. Now I´m happy again, great work, 10 points go to Italy!
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Roelof, hace 8 añosThe addon doesn't save trusted, untrusted and custom entries. Maybe the plugin stores information in non-persistent storage (which is cleared with any privacy-aware configuration).
This makes the plugin unusable, as re-allowing all services every single time is way more time consuming than just blocking scripts alltogether.
And even if you manage to save settings, they're not synched, so users who use two or more devices need to re-apply settings every time, on every. single. device.
The old version worked a whole lot better, it's a shame this level of quaity has not yet been achieved on the new WebExtension version. - Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13577838, hace 8 añosThe latest extension for Firefox Quantum is a real PITA because whitelisted sites are not saved, so they have to be recreated every time FF restarts. Extremely annoying and time consuming.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 12727415, hace 8 añosStill utterly indispensable, and still the first add-on that gets installed to any Firefox installation.
As for the recent UI changes: the developer's hands are tied (VERY tied) by Mozilla's changes to Firefox v57+, which completely removed the earlier support structures - so instead of complaining, please show a little more respect and learn something of the background/new interface:
https://hackademix.net/2017/12/04/noscript-quantum-vs-legacy-in-a-nutshell-2/ - Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13576248, hace 8 añosThis crap does not remember settings, it loads default settings everytime I start firefox..
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Thesleeper, hace 8 años
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 12583337, hace 8 añosBeen using it for years but had always found the NS interface clumsy and painful to use. No more. I really like the new changes they made in the WE extensions. It's alot more compact with all the options next to each site as opposed to spread apart in a messy sprawling menu. Really good change. I really appreciate having the ability to reload the page directly from the no-script menu as well, making the trial and error of figuring out which sites are necessary and which are ads much easier.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 10507556, hace 8 añosGreat job on this Giorgio! The interface that users are whining about is by far less confusing than uMatrix and more stable than ScriptSafe. I think this is an amazing time for developers to continue to put out work that is making a difference in a now fast and modern Firefox. People can't handle change and for those that are struggling with the learning curve there are ample choices. Giorgio, I think the world of all the time you spent on this.
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur manuel, hace 8 años
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13574269, hace 8 añosThe new interface and options screen is not very good. It used to be slick looking now its just confusing and ugly. Reminds me of very old websites where the fonts are huge and colorful. Long time users can probably find their way around still but new users will think its a piece of junk.
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13573279, hace 8 añosHopefully, NoScript will soon be a usable piece of software again. The options are manageable but difficult to use without manual or tutorial. It is possible to form a group via the input field. But then you have to edit each line individually. It would be good to have a checkbox in front of each line. The selected operation should then apply to the selected rows. I find it unfortunate to have to give lines the "default status", then close the window and open it again to remove entries. Where is the problem with the "Delete-Button"? To the user interface could be improved much more. Html is powerful if you know to use it. I hope, you will find the time to improve this. I believe, it will take less then 3% of the time to code the base, but these 3% could lead to 99% user-satisfaction. Thank you.
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg hace 8 añosDid you have any chance to check
https://hackademix.net/2017/12/04/noscript-quantum-vs-legacy-in-a-nutshell-2/ ?
Hope it helps - Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13572041, hace 8 añosWhile I am personally also not quite happy about the recent version change, I am glad that this add on receives active development. It is a GOOD addon, despite the fact, that not everything has improved with the recent update.
There are bound to be setbacks when redeveloping large parts of an application.
Personally, I like the interface, but there are some things I miss from the old interface - like the option to allow scripts globally (temporarily), which I find necessary at times. To do that, I have to go into the configuration screen- which has a bug and freezes for about a minute - on all my machines.
I'd like to thank the developer for the effort he put into this. Please keep up the good work, I am sure this addon will receive top reviews again soon! - Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13569810, hace 8 añosIt took me 2 hours of playing with this new version of noscript, but I've finally figured out how to use this non-intuitive version. I was like most here thinking it was totally ruined, but in fact I just had no clue how to use it. One nice thing, clicking "Trusted" only temporarily trusts a site (unless you click it twice). Be careful when playing with "Default" -for any site- as it changes settings globally (not intuitive at all)!!!
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Max, hace 8 años
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13569382, hace 8 añosThank you Giorgio.
I finally understand by reading https://hackademix.net/2017/12/04/noscript-quantum-vs-legacy-in-a-nutshell-2/
It works perfectly on my Firefox 57 quantum so far although a bit complicated.