Iceggiren i Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike sɣur Dmitry Selivanov
Icegger-it prince
Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5
sɣur prince, pred 6 meseci4 736 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur aUser, pred 4 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur petethecanuck, pred 4 dnevigreat add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Sweet Citrus, pred 4 dnevi[Editing my review]
The problem I mentioned prior is gone now. I can now rate this 5/5!! - Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 17708027, pred 7 dneviПолезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Zelgadis-San, pred 9 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Juraj Mäsiar, pred 13 dneviThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13519206, pred 14 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18900251, pred 15 dneviThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg pred 14 dneviI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Riku70X, pred 18 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur malisipi, pred 18 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur placidtea, pred 19 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Spigot, pred 20 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Dale Cooper, pred 21 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18909402, pred 21 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Kiwi18, pred 22 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 15889624, pred 22 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Cameron Owens, pred 23 dneviI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg pred 22 dneviGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur kuroten, pred 25 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Nicky McCurdy, pred 25 dneviThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18144459, pred 25 dnevi
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19547104, pred enim mesecem
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur qawas, pred enim mesecemStay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg pred enim mesecemMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 6120711, pred enim mesecemasking for premium for such a simple addon
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg pred enim mesecemMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Chantelle, pred enim mesecemThe iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg pred enim mesecemYeah, you are. Begging things other people built to be free.