Iceggiren i Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike sɣur Dmitry Selivanov
Icegger-it Sweet Citrus
Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5
sɣur Sweet Citrus, prije 4 dana[Editing my review]
The problem I mentioned prior is gone now. I can now rate this 5/5!!
The problem I mentioned prior is gone now. I can now rate this 5/5!!
4 736 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur aUser, prije 4 dana
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur petethecanuck, prije 4 danagreat add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
- Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 17708027, prije 7 danaПолезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Zelgadis-San, prije 8 dana
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Juraj Mäsiar, prije 12 danaThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13519206, prije 14 dana
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18900251, prije 14 danaThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije 14 danaI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Riku70X, prije 17 dana
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur malisipi, prije 17 dana
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur placidtea, prije 19 dana
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Spigot, prije 19 dana
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Dale Cooper, prije 20 dana
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18909402, prije 20 dana
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Kiwi18, prije 21 dana
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 15889624, prije 22 dana
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Cameron Owens, prije 22 danaI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije 22 danaGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur kuroten, prije 24 dana
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Nicky McCurdy, prije 24 danaThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18144459, prije 24 dana
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19547104, prije 25 dana
- Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur qawas, prije mjesecStay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije mjesecMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Yettwasezmel 1 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 6120711, prije mjesecasking for premium for such a simple addon
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije mjesecMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Yettwasezmel 2 ɣef 5sɣur Chantelle, prije mjesecThe iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg prije mjesecYeah, you are. Begging things other people built to be free.