Icegger-it kriztmark hacking session
626 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 17896262, 16 oeren lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Yubel, ien dei lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur geegamr, 2 dagen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19661319, 6 dagen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 16948111, 7 dagen lynWorth it just for the precise percentage on the reviews, rather than the fuzzy review category, which can be bombed.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur AxolotlFae, 10 dagen lynThis plugin saves me a lot of time switching between tabs to compare sites. I'm fine with the VaporLens feature and would like it to stay. If you have to, just make it an opt-in feature
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19647462, 15 dagen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19640117, 19 dagen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Berserk, 23 dagen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur KevK, 24 dagen lynIt's an awesome addition to the conservative Steam website, just like augmented Steam and you know it.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur ZeroUnderscoreOu, ien moanne lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Lamizor, ien moanne lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Ibadullah, ien moanne lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur oprypin, ien moanne lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Smartik1, ien moanne lynTo address the concern around the newly requested permission for Website Content (which also freaked me out), the code is posted on GitHub. I checked the changes, the change was made by the same guy who has been developing this since early 2023. Nothing malicious was added to the code and the data type is not what we all think it is. Here is the definition Firefox provide for the Website Content permission:
"Covers anything visible on a website – such as text, images, videos and links – as well as anything embedded like cookies, audio, page headers, request and response information."
I'd emphasize that this is separate from the Browsing Activity category, which this plugin does not ask for. The very next change committed was a check whether the game is in your library, so it is possible the permissions were for this:
"in_library": {
"message": "In Library",
"description": "Indicates that the user owns this product"
},
That being said, it would have been good if the dev explicitly clarified why the permission request is there, either on the extension install page or within GitHub to put everyone's mind at ease. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur catwithlonghair, ien moanne lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Kacp3rowsky, ien moanne lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Deo, ien moanne lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 19597756, ien moanne lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 18700927, ien moanne lynEnhances the Steam website and adds a lot of great functionality. I have enjoyed the convenience of this extension for years. Highly recommended!
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Jacob, 2 moannen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur vra, 2 moannen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur skimoo, 2 moannen lyn
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur UsernameTaken017, 2 moannen lyn