Iceggiren i Temporary Containers
Temporary Containers sɣur stoically
277 n yiceggiren
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur crankycoder, 6 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Paul McLanahan, 6 χρόνια πρινI love this addon! There are so many options, and it's such a huge win for web privacy! I hope many of these ideas can be integrated into Firefox itself. Brilliant work!
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Mariachi, 6 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Phantasma, 6 χρόνια πρινEdit3. I removed my previous text and changed rating from four to five stars, i found add-on that caused this annoying (duplicate tab) issue.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur calebburton, 6 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur kvdias, 6 χρόνια πρινAn incredible improvement over the default Private Window and an excellent complement to the official Multi-Account Containers add-on.
Steep learning curve but once you get your head around the container concept, it is remarkably powerful. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14441753, 6 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14432039, 7 χρόνια πρινOptions were a little confusing to setup, but overall this is a fantastic extension and it's a shame that this functionality wasn't in the official multi-container extension to begin with.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Fruchtenstein, 7 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur claustromaniac, 7 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur asras, 7 χρόνια πρινFreaking amazing [idea, implementation, and] use of Firefox's containers. Thank you!
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur pedz, 7 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur КЭП, 7 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14329427, 7 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 12786878, 7 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Flengo, 7 χρόνια πριν
- Yettwasezmel 4 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14264986, 7 χρόνια πρινGreat extension to isolate user activity without doing much work by the user, in automatic mode. However, I noticed a few problems.
Right click menu on a link does not provide "open in new temporary container"
Dragging a selected text into the address bar, (which I imagine does something equivalent to opening a new tab, putting that text into the address bar and clicking 'go'.) actually does the whole thing in the same container I am in. This prevents the isolation.
Could this be caused by some settings? I use the recommended settings (Automatic mode and global setting of open cntrl+click or middle click into new container.)Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 6 χρόνια πρινThanks! The context menu (right click) on a link should provide that option - and in my case it works. Sometimes HTML/CSS makes text look like links but in fact they are not actually "a-elements" which are needed for the context menu to work. You might want to check at several places and also make sure you didn't deactivate the context menu in the Advanced -> General -> Context Menu preferences. In case the problem persists I'd need more information; feel free to open a new issue on GitHub in this case: https://github.com/stoically/temporary-containers/issues
Dragging text into the address bar is not catched by "Mouse Clicks"-Isolation. You'd need to configure "Navigating in Tabs"-Isolation for that to work. The reason the Navigating-Isolation isn't recommended is that it breaks redirects to 3rd-party domains (e.g. SSO Logins, Payments) which need to be dealt with. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 14145875, 7 χρόνια πρινThis addon is exactly what i was looking for. It can be configured to open all sites in their own container and most importantly, removing cookies once the tab is closed and keeping them separate from other containers.
I found one tiny annoyance however: when using the extension as a default for all new tabs opened and opening a new tab with either CTRL+T or by clicking the new tab icon, the url field is not focused afterwards, so I have to hit CTRL+L or click the field before i can type a new url. The normal behavior of firefox is to focus the url field after opening a new tab, making it easy to just start typing a new url.
So I just would like an option (or default behavior) that the url field is focused after a new tab is opened, so I can just type the url right after hitting CTRL+T.Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 6 χρόνια πρινIn Automatic Mode new tabs should get focus since they are just opened by the Firefox Webextensions API - and it works for me. Maybe it was a fluke in Firefox, but if the problem persists for you I'd need more information about your environment and settings - the best way would be a new issue on GitHub: https://github.com/stoically/temporary-containers/issues. Thanks. - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13861609, 7 χρόνια πρινSo far the best container extension out there I've found to complement Mozilla's original extension. I love how ridiculously specific the options get, and the Alt-X shortcut (opening a new tab in the same container as the active one) has saved me so much mouse movement.
- Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur Pavel1114, 7 χρόνια πρινУже было думал придётся самому изучать и писать расширение для себя. Но, к счастью, наткнулся на temporary containers. Это именно то что я искал. Спасибо авторам!
- Yettwasezmel 3 ɣef 5sɣur Aseqdac Firefox 13962360, 7 χρόνια πρινok but supercookies in SiteSecurityServiceState.txt are not cleared!
Tiririt n ineflayen
yeffeɣ-d deg 6 χρόνια πρινContainers don't include the HSTS response cache (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Contextual_Identity_Project/Containers#What_is_.28and_isn.27t.29_separated_between_Containers) and as such it's not removed when containers itself are removed. Unfortunately no way for Add-ons to clear that cache in any other way. The bug where this decision was made can be found here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1253006 - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur mk.pl, 7 χρόνια πρινgreat. but confusing to configure.
requires more resources but you can configure it to avoid overuse - Yettwasezmel 5 ɣef 5sɣur grahamperrin, 7 χρόνια πρινLooking good with Waterfox –
https://github.com/mozilla/multi-account-containers/issues/929#issuecomment-394054592